Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;45(3):337-45.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv201. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Older care-home residents as collaborators or advisors in research: a systematic review

Tamara Backhouse  1 , Andrea Kenkmann  1 , Kathleen Lane  1 , Bridget Penhale  1 , Fiona Poland  1 , Anne Killett  1
Affiliations

Older care-home residents as collaborators or advisors in research: a systematic review

Tamara Backhouse et al. Age Ageing. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: patient and public involvement (PPI) in research can enhance its relevance. Older care-home residents are often not involved in research processes even when studies are care-home focused.

Objective: to conduct a systematic review to find out to what extent and how older care-home residents have been involved in research as collaborators or advisors.

Methods: a systematic literature search of 12 databases, covering the period from 1990 to September 2014 was conducted. A lateral search was also carried out. Standardised inclusion criteria were used and checked independently by two researchers.

Results: nineteen reports and papers were identified relating to 11 different studies. Care-home residents had been involved in the research process in multiple ways. Two key themes were identified: (i) the differences in residents' involvement in small-scale and large-scale studies and (ii) the barriers to and facilitators of involvement.

Conclusions: small-scale studies involved residents as collaborators in participatory action research, whereas larger studies involved residents as consultants in advisory roles. There are multiple facilitators of and barriers to involving residents as PPI members. The reporting of PPI varies. While it is difficult to evaluate the impact of involving care-home residents on the research outcomes, impact has been demonstrated from more inclusive research processes with care-home residents. The review shows that older care-home residents can be successfully involved in the research process.

Keywords: PPI; care home; older people; older resident; patient and public involvement; research; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of literature review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dewar BJ. Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research—a framework for future development and understanding. Int J Older People Nurs Assoc J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 48–53. - PubMed
    1. Baur V, Abma T, Widdershoven G. Participation of marginalised groups in evaluation: mission impossible? Eval Program Plann 2010; 33: 238–45. - PubMed
    1. Davies SL, Goodman C, Manthorpe J, Smith A, Carrick N, Iliffe S. Enabling research in care homes: an evaluation of a national network of research ready care homes. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ENRICH. Enabling Research in Care Homes, A Tool Kit for Care Home Research 2013. http://www.enrich.nihr.ac.uk/ (11 January 2016, date last accessed).
    1. Froggatt KA, Davies S, Atkinson L et al. . The joys and tribulations of partnership working in care homes for older people. Qual Ageing 2006; 7: 26–32.

Publication types