Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Mar;45(2):209-16.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv192. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Global variation in grip strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis of normative data

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Global variation in grip strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis of normative data

Richard M Dodds et al. Age Ageing. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: weak grip strength is a key component of sarcopenia and is associated with subsequent disability and mortality. We have recently established life course normative data for grip strength in Great Britain, but it is unclear whether the cut points we derived for weak grip strength are suitable for use in other settings. Our objective was to investigate differences in grip strength by world region using our data as a reference standard.

Methods: we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for reporting age- and gender-stratified normative data for grip strength. We extracted each item of normative data and converted it on to a Z-score scale relative to our British centiles. We performed meta-regression to pool the Z-scores and compare them by world region.

Findings: our search returned 806 abstracts. Sixty papers met inclusion criteria and reported on 63 different samples. Seven UN regions were represented, although most samples (n = 44) were based in developed regions. We extracted 726 normative data items relating to 96,537 grip strength observations. Normative data from developed regions were broadly similar to our British centiles, with a pooled Z-score 0.12 SDs (95% CI: 0.07, 0.17) above the corresponding British centiles. By comparison, normative data from developing regions were clearly lower, with a pooled Z-score of -0.85 SDs (95% CI: -0.94, -0.76).

Interpretation: our findings support the use of our British grip strength centiles and their associated cut points in consensus definitions for sarcopenia and frailty across developed regions, but highlight the need for different cut points in developing regions.

Keywords: grip strength; international; old people; sarcopenia; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Country setting of included samples by UN region. The chart shows the country setting of the 63 included samples, grouped by UN region.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Grip strength mean values from included samples, by UN region. Each point represents the mean value of grip strength for each item of normative data, plotted against the mid-point of the age range it relates to. Values from the same sample are connected. Data from developing and developed regions are shown with triangles and circles, respectively. For comparison, the grey curve shows the mean values from our normative data for 12 British studies.

References

    1. Sayer AA, Kirkwood TBL. Grip strength and mortality: a biomarker of ageing? Lancet 2015; 386: 226–7. - PubMed
    1. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S et al. . Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet 2015; 386: 266–73. - PubMed
    1. Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R, Mortality Review Group. Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010; 341: c4467. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper R, Kuh D, Cooper C et al. . Objective measures of physical capability and subsequent health: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2011; 40: 14–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheung C-L, Nguyen U-SDT, Au E, Tan KCB, Kung AWC. Association of handgrip strength with chronic diseases and multimorbidity. Age (Dordr) 2013; 35: 929–41. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms