Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;26(1):46-52.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052683. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

Labelling of electronic cigarettes: regulations and current practice

Federico Buonocore  1 , Ana C N Marques Gomes  1 , Shereen Nabhani-Gebara  1 , Stephen J Barton  1 , Gianpiero Calabrese  1
Affiliations

Labelling of electronic cigarettes: regulations and current practice

Federico Buonocore et al. Tob Control. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade e-cigarettes have established themselves in the global market. E-cigarettes triggered much interest in relation to their content and efficacy as smoking cessation tools, but less attention has been paid to users and environmental safety warnings and guidance. Several regulations have been introduced to promote their safe handling and disposal. From May 2016, liquids and cartridges will be regulated by European Community Directives (ECDs) 2001/83/EC and 93/42/EEC, or 2014/40/EU if marketed as tobacco-related products. Currently, manufacturers and distributors must abide by the Chemical (Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply) Regulations 2009 (CHIP) or Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulations (CLP), the latter replacing CHIP in June 2015.

Objective: In this work, the compliance of marketed e-liquids and e-cigarettes with current European Union and UK legislations is assessed.

Results: E-liquids and e-cigarettes (21 and 9 brands, respectively) were evaluated. Evidence of non-compliance was found in relation to the CHIP/CLP toxic (13%) and environmental (37%) pictograms, tactile warning (23%), nominal amount of solution (30%), supplier contact telephone number and address (40%). None of the evaluated e-cigarettes displayed information on the correct disposal/recycling of batteries in line with the ECD 2006/66/EC.

Conclusions: More stringent enforcement of regulations is needed to ensure not only the user's safety and awareness, but also the safeguarding of the environment.

Keywords: Electronic nicotine delivery devices; Environment; Nicotine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Contradictory information reported on secondary packaging of Magnifecig is highlighted by yellow ellipses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bauld L, Angus K, de Andrade M. E-cigarette uptake and marketing A report commissioned by Public Health England. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... (accessed 7 Mar 2015).
    1. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Licensing Procedure for Electronic Cigarettes and Other Nicotine Containing Products (NCPs) as Medicines. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/comms-ic/documents/websiteresources/c... (accessed 11 Mar 2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trading Standards—Derbyshire County Council. Selling Electronic Cigarettes (E-cigs). http://www.derbyshire.gov.uk/images/sfy31_tcm44–247854.pdf (accessed 12 Mar 2015).
    1. Sheffield Trading Standards. Product Safety Information Sheet e-cigarettes & liquids. https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/dms/scc/management/corporate-communications... (accessed 12 Mar 2015).
    1. Southwark Council. E-cigarettes and e-shisha product safety. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=10&... (accessed 10 Mar 2015).

Publication types

MeSH terms