Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed
- PMID: 26791431
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.008
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed
Abstract
Objectives: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group has developed GRADE evidence profiles (EP) and summary of findings (SoF) tables to present evidence summaries in systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and health technology assessments. Explanatory notes are used to explain choices and judgments in these summaries, for example, on rating of the quality of evidence.
Study design and setting: A systematic survey of the explanations in SoF tables in 132 randomly selected Cochrane Intervention reviews and in EPs of 10 guidelines. We analyzed the content of 1,291 explanations using a predefined list of criteria.
Results: Most explanations were used to describe or communicate results and to explain downgrading of the quality of evidence, in particular for risk of bias and imprecision. Addressing the source of baseline risk (observational data or control group risk) was often missing. For judgments about downgrading the quality of evidence, the percentage of informative explanations ranged between 41% (imprecision) and 79% (indirectness).
Conclusion: We found that by and large explanations were informative but detected several areas for improvement (e.g., source of baseline risk and judgments on imprecision). Guidance about explanatory footnotes and comments will be provided in the last article in this series.
Keywords: GRADE; GRADEpro; Health technology assessment; Quality of evidence; Risk of bias; Summary of findings tables; Systematic reviews.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 12. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 26796947
-
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 26791430 Clinical Trial.
-
[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22818160 German.
-
Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached "high" GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;78:22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 27038850 Review.
-
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256168 Review.
Cited by
-
Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies.PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0187271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187271. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29324741 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of substituting soymilk for cow's milk and intermediate cardiometabolic outcomes: understanding the impact of dairy alternatives in the transition to plant-based diets on cardiometabolic health.BMC Med. 2024 Aug 22;22(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03524-7. BMC Med. 2024. PMID: 39169353 Free PMC article.
-
Nordic dietary patterns and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomised controlled trials.Diabetologia. 2022 Dec;65(12):2011-2031. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05760-z. Epub 2022 Aug 26. Diabetologia. 2022. PMID: 36008559 Free PMC article.
-
Development and use of health outcome descriptors: a guideline development case study.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 5;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01338-8. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32503619 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources