Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jan 20:16:10.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0780-0.

A study of an intelligent system to support decision making in the management of labour using the cardiotocograph - the INFANT study protocol

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A study of an intelligent system to support decision making in the management of labour using the cardiotocograph - the INFANT study protocol

Peter Brocklehurst et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labour is widely used but its potential for improving fetal and neonatal outcomes has not been realised. The most likely reason is the difficulty of interpreting the fetal heart rate trace correctly during labour. Computerised interpretation of the fetal heart rate and intelligent decision-support has the potential to deliver this improvement in care. This trial will test whether the addition of decision support software to aid the interpretation of the cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour will reduce the number of 'poor neonatal outcomes' in those women judged to require continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.

Methods and design: An individually randomised controlled trial of 46,000 women who are judged to require continuous electronic fetal monitoring in labour.

Eligibility criteria: Women admitted to a participating labour ward who are judged to require continuous electronic fetal monitoring, have a singleton or twin pregnancy, are ≥ 35 weeks' gestation, have no known gross fetal abnormality and are ≥ 16 years of age.

Exclusion criteria: Triplets or higher order pregnancy, elective caesarean section prior to the onset of labour, planned admission to NICU. Trial interventions: Computerised interpretation of the CTG with decision-support.

Primary outcomes: Short term: A composite of 'poor neonatal outcome' including stillbirth after trial entry, early neonatal death except deaths due to congenital anomalies, significant morbidity: neonatal encephalopathy, admissions to the neonatal unit with 48 h for > 48 h with evidence of feeding difficulties, respiratory illness or encephalopathy where there is evidence of compromise at birth. Long term: Developmental assessment at the age of 2 years in a subset of 7000 surviving babies.

Data collection: For all participating women and babies, labour variables and outcomes will be stored automatically and contemporaneously onto the Guardian® system.

Discussion: The results of this trial will have importance for pregnant women and for health professionals who provide care for them.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN98680152 assigned 30.09.2008.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The data collection system (Guardian) displays the CTG data on the screen
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Clinical Management flow diagram

References

    1. Levene MI. The asphyxiated newborn infant. In: Levene MI, Lilford RJ, Bennett MJ, Punt J, editors. Fetal and Neonatal Neurology and Neurosurgery. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. pp. 405–425.
    1. Volpe JJ. Neurology of the Newborn. In: Volpe JJ, editor. Neurology of the Newborn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994. pp. 314–369.
    1. Macfarlane A, Johnson A, Mugford M. Epidemiology. In: Rennie JM, Roberton NRC, editors. Textbook of Neonatology. 3. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. pp. 3–33.
    1. Hon EH. The classification of fetal heart rate. I. A working classification. Obstet Gynecol. 1963;22:137–46. - PubMed
    1. Hon EH. Instrumentation of fetal heart rate and fetal electrocardiography II. A vaginal electrode. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1963;86:772–84. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data