Adolescents in Peer Groups Make More Prudent Decisions When a Slightly Older Adult Is Present
- PMID: 26791822
- DOI: 10.1177/0956797615620379
Adolescents in Peer Groups Make More Prudent Decisions When a Slightly Older Adult Is Present
Abstract
Adolescents make more reckless decisions when with peers than when alone, which poses a challenge for organizations that place adolescents in situations in which risky and myopic decision making is problematic. We asked whether the effect of peers on adolescents' decision making is mitigated by the presence of a slightly older adult. We examined whether target subjects' risk taking was greater when they were in groups of 4 late-adolescent males (ages 18-22) than when they were in groups that mixed 3 late-adolescent males with 1 slightly older adult (age 25-30); risk taking in both of these conditions was compared with that of adolescents tested alone. We found that adolescents took more risks and expressed stronger preference for immediate rewards when they were grouped with 3 same-age peers than when they were alone. When 1 adolescent was replaced by someone slightly older, however, adolescents' decision making and reward processing resembled that seen when adolescents were tested alone. Adding a young adult to a work team of adolescents may improve group decision making.
Keywords: adolescent development; decision making; intergroup dynamics; judgment; risk taking.
© The Author(s) 2016.
Similar articles
-
Joint Effects of Peer Presence and Fatigue on Risk and Reward Processing in Late Adolescence.J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Sep;46(9):1878-1890. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0690-8. Epub 2017 May 22. J Youth Adolesc. 2017. PMID: 28534149
-
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006. PMID: 26158695
-
Peers Increase Late Adolescents' Exploratory Behavior and Sensitivity to Positive and Negative Feedback.J Res Adolesc. 2016 Dec;26(4):696-705. doi: 10.1111/jora.12219. Epub 2015 Aug 19. J Res Adolesc. 2016. PMID: 28453197 Clinical Trial.
-
Sexual activity and contraceptive use: the components of the decisionmaking process.Stud Fam Plann. 1998 Jun;29(2):154-66. Stud Fam Plann. 1998. PMID: 9664629 Review.
-
[Risk-taking in adolescence: A neuroeconomics approach].Encephale. 2010 Apr;36(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Sep 22. Encephale. 2010. PMID: 20434632 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Risk-Taking Behavior Among Male Adolescents: The Role of Observer Presence and Individual Self-Control.J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Nov;51(11):2161-2172. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01659-5. Epub 2022 Jul 21. J Youth Adolesc. 2022. PMID: 35861907
-
How Cues of Being Watched Promote Risk Seeking in Fund Investment in Older Adults.Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 12;12:765632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.765632. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35095651 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Different Kinds of Incentives on Decision-Making and Cognitive Control in Adolescent Development: A Review of Behavioral and Neuroscientific Studies.Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00768. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29875720 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Group Intertemporal Decision-Making Process.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;14(9):815. doi: 10.3390/bs14090815. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39336030 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical considerations for developing pediatric mhealth interventions for teens with socially complex needs.J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2023 Feb;36(1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12396. Epub 2022 Sep 22. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2023. PMID: 36134754 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical