Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct-Dec;40(4):244-8.
doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.40.04.02. Epub 2014 Dec 14.

Polytrauma and Multiple Severity Scores

Daniela Cernea  1 , M Novac  1 , P O Drăgoescu  2 , Andreea Stănculescu  1 , Lucica Duca  1 , A A Al-Enezy  2 , Nicoleta Alice Drăgoescu  1
Affiliations

Polytrauma and Multiple Severity Scores

Daniela Cernea et al. Curr Health Sci J. 2014 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

The initial assessment and management of seriously injured patients is a challenging task and requires a rapid and systematic approach. Injuries causing this mortality occur in predictable patterns and recognition of these patterns led to the development of advanced trauma life support (ATLS) by the American College of Surgeons, and standardized protocol for trauma patient evaluation has been developed. Different systems of trauma scoring have been developed. This study was conducted out of the need for unified scale to assess polytrauma patients from the moment patient are admitted in, till when discharged from Intensive Care Unit (ICU), so we compared the accuracy of few scoring systems in predicting mortality rate in polytrauma patients, and then assessed the cost-effectiveness applying these methods, and how much are these applicable. Here we chose 3 scoring systems: Glasgow Coma scale (GCS), Revised Trauma score (RTS) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scales (APACHE II). APACHE II system proved to be helpful in giving primary impression about case prognosis, and overall it reflects the quality level provided in the facility which is providing the health care for the polytraumatized patients, and it can be used as unified scale to compare the healthcare results and outcomes in different hospitals. APACHE II can be considered to be a largely accurate and applicable system for the polytraumatized patients but the association between three of scores offers better results about predicting prognosis of these patients.

Keywords: intensive care unit; polytrauma; severity scores.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bouillon B, Lefring R, Vorweg M, et al. Trauma scoring systems. J Trauma. 1997;42:652–658. - PubMed
    1. Moore L, Lavoie A, LeSage N, et al. Statistical validation of the Revised Trauma Score. J Trauma. 2006;60:305–311. - PubMed
    1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–829. - PubMed
    1. Hafiz NA. Evaluation of revised Trauma Score in poly-traumatized patients. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2004;14(5):286–289. - PubMed
    1. Champion HR, Copes WS. The major trauma outcome study: Establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma. 1990;30:1356–1365. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources