Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Apr;106(4):748-54.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303007. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Low Birth Weight in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Low Birth Weight in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia

Melissa L Martinson et al. Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare associations between socioeconomic status and low birth weight across the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, countries that share cultural features but differ in terms of public support and health care systems.

Methods: Using nationally representative data from the United States (n = 8400), the United Kingdom (n = 12 018), Canada (n = 5350), and Australia (n = 3452) from the early 2000s, we calculated weighted prevalence rates and adjusted odds of low birth weight by income quintile and maternal education.

Results: Socioeconomic gradients in low birth weight were apparent in all 4 countries, but the magnitudes and patterns differed across countries. A clear graded association between income quintile and low birth weight was apparent in the United States. The relevant distinction in the United Kingdom appeared to be between low, middle, and high incomes, and the distinction in Canada and Australia appeared to be between mothers in the lowest income quintile and higher-income mothers.

Conclusions: Socioeconomic inequalities in low birth weight were larger in the United States than the other countries, suggesting that the more generous social safety nets and health care systems in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia played buffering roles.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Case A, Lubotsky D, Paxson C. Economic status and health in childhood: the origins of the gradient. Am Econ Rev. 2002;92(5):1308–1334. - PubMed
    1. Currie J, Stabile M. Socioeconomic status and child health: why is the relationship stronger for older children? Am Econ Rev. 2003;93(5):1813–1823. - PubMed
    1. Currie A, Shields MA, Price SW. The child health/family income gradient: evidence from England. J Health Econ. 2007;26(2):213–232. - PubMed
    1. Case A, Lee D, Paxson C. The income gradient in children’s health: a comment on Currie, Shields and Wheatley Price. J Health Econ. 2008;27(3):801–807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khanam R, Nghiem HS, Connelly LB. Child health and the income gradient: evidence from Australia. J Health Econ. 2009;28(4):805–817. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources