Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients with cancer receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority study
- PMID: 26795844
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00520-3
Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients with cancer receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority study
Abstract
Background: Palonosetron has shown efficacy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults undergoing moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of palonosetron versus ondansetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients.
Methods: In this multicentre, multinational, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study, paediatric patients aged between 0 and younger than 17 years, who were naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, and scheduled to undergo moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant disease were randomised centrally (1:1:1) to receive up to four cycles of 10 μg/kg or 20 μg/kg palonosetron on day 1, or three 150 μg/kg doses of ondansetron on day 1, scheduled 4 h apart, according to a static central permuted block randomisation scheme by an interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified according to age and emetogenicity. Treatment allocation was masked to project team members involved in data collection and analysis, and members of the investigator's team. The primary endpoint was complete response (no vomiting, retching, or use of rescue drugs) during the acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle, as assessed in the population of randomly assigned patients who received moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and an active study drug. The primary efficacy objective was to show the non-inferiority of palonosetron versus ondansetron during the acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle through comparison of the difference in the proportions of patients who achieved a complete response with palonosetron (πT) minus ondansetron (πR) versus a preset non-inferiority margin (δ -15%). To be considered as non-inferior to ondansetron, for at least one of the doses of palonosetron, the lower limit of the 97·5% CI for the weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates had to be superior to -15%. Safety was assessed, according to treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01442376, and has been completed.
Findings: Between Sept 12, 2011, and Oct 26, 2012, we randomly assigned 502 patients; 169 were assigned to receive 10 μg/kg palonosetron, 169 to receive 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and 164 to receive 3 × 150 μg/kg ondansetron, of whom 166, 165, and 162, respectively, were included in the efficacy analysis. In the acute phase, complete responses were recorded in 90 (54%) patients in the 10 μg/kg palonosetron group, 98 (59%) in the 20 μg/kg palonosetron group, and 95 (59%) in the ondansetron group. Non-inferiority versus ondansetron was shown for 20 μg/kg palonosetron in the acute phase (weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates 0·36% [97·5% CI -11·7 to 12·4]; p=0·0022). Non-inferiority versus ondansetron was not shown for 10 μg/kg palonosetron in the acute phase (weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates -4·41% [97·5% CI -16·4 to 7·6]). In the first on-study treatment cycle, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 134 (80%) of 167 patients who received 10 μg/kg palonosetron, 113 (69%) of 163 who received 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and 134 (82%) of 164 who received ondansetron. The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were nervous system disorders, mainly headache, which occurred in three (2%) patients who received 10 μg/kg palonosetron, one (<1%) patient who received 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and two (1%) patients who received ondansetron. The incidence of serious adverse events in the first on-study treatment cycle was lower in the 20 μg/kg palonosetron group (43 [26%]) than in the 10 μg/kg palonosetron group (52 [31%]) and the ondansetron group (55 [34%]).
Interpretation: Non-inferiority was shown for 20 μg/kg palonosetron during the acute phase of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle. 20 μg/kg palonosetron is now indicated by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients aged 1 month to younger than 17 years.
Funding: Helsinn Healthcare.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Chemotherapy-induced vomiting in children: some progress, more questions.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):264-265. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00582-3. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26795845 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, comparative phase III trial.Lancet Oncol. 2009 Feb;10(2):115-24. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70313-9. Epub 2009 Jan 8. Lancet Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19135415 Clinical Trial.
-
Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron.Ann Oncol. 2003 Oct;14(10):1570-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg417. Ann Oncol. 2003. PMID: 14504060 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, open-label non-inferiority study to compare palonosetron and ondansetron for prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting in children with cancer receiving moderate or high emetogenic chemotherapy.Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3091-3097. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4158-5. Epub 2018 Mar 22. Support Care Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29564625 Clinical Trial.
-
Palonosetron: a unique 5-HT3 receptor antagonist indicated for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2004 May;2(5):284-9. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2004. PMID: 16163194 Review.
-
Palonosetron.Drugs. 2004;64(10):1125-32; discussion 1133-4. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464100-00006. Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15139789 Review.
Cited by
-
FLOT (a chemotherapy regimen for gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer): to be treated as a highly emetogenic regimen or a moderately emetogenic one? Comparison of the emetogenic potential of FLOT versus FOLFOX and TAC regimens.Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):3865-3873. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06832-x. Epub 2022 Jan 17. Support Care Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35038031
-
Fact-finding and risk factor analysis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children with solid tumors: a prospective observational study.BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05451-9. BMC Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 39891130 Free PMC article.
-
Palonosetron in pediatric patients: A single-center, retrospective evaluation of policy and clinical practice guideline discordance.J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):251-255. doi: 10.1177/10781552241233489. Epub 2024 Feb 29. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2025. PMID: 38425048 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Antiemetic Effectiveness of Palonosetron Versus Ondansetron in Patients on Cancer Chemotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study in South Indians.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):FC10-FC14. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25129.9818. Epub 2017 May 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28658796 Free PMC article.
-
Palonosetron for prevention of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 26;32(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08283-4. Support Care Cancer. 2023. PMID: 38145979
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical