Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;137(5):1615-1628.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002111.

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Angiography Study of the Interperforator Flow of the Lower Leg

Affiliations

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Angiography Study of the Interperforator Flow of the Lower Leg

Yoo Joon Sur et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: The area perfused by a single perforator depends on its perforasome and its unique interperforator flow pattern. The purpose of this study was to clarify the interperforator flow patterns of the peroneal and posterior tibial artery perforators using three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography.

Methods: Thirteen whole-leg skin flaps were harvested in the subfascial plane from fresh cadavers. Peroneal, posterior tibial, anterior tibial, and sural artery perforators with a diameter greater than 0.5 mm were documented. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography with an injection of iodinated contrast medium into the peroneal or posterior tibial artery perforator was used to investigate the percentages of the area and the perforators that were perfused.

Results: The mean percentage of the total area perfused was as follows: peroneal artery perforator, 42.0 percent; posterior tibial artery perforator, 38.0 percent (p = 0.084). The mean percentage of the total perforators perfused was as follows: peroneal artery perforator, 55.0 percent; posterior tibial artery perforator, 44.2 percent (p = 0.004). Although the mean percentages of same-source artery perforators perfused by a peroneal artery perforator (73.6 percent) and by a posterior tibial artery perforator (77.2 percent) did not differ (p = 0.513), the mean percentages of other-source artery perforators perfused by a peroneal artery perforator (49.9 percent) and by a posterior tibial artery perforator (32.3 percent) were significantly different (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a single peroneal or posterior tibial artery perforator perfused approximately 40 percent of the whole leg surface and that peroneal and posterior tibial artery perforators had different interperforator flow patterns. The results of this study may improve preoperative planning for pedicled perforator flap surgery.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, V.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Schaverien MV, Hamilton SA, Fairburn N, Rao P, Quaba AA. Lower limb reconstruction using the islanded posterior tibial artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:17351743.
    1. Lu TC, Lin CH, Lin CH, Lin YT, Chen RF, Wei FC. Versatility of the pedicled peroneal artery perforator flaps for soft-tissue coverage of the lower leg and foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:386393.
    1. Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, Mojallal A, Saint-Cyr M. Pedicled-perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: A systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28:595601.
    1. Hallock GG. A paradigm shift in flap selection protocols for zones of the lower extremity using perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013;29:233240.
    1. Innocenti M, Menichini G, Baldrighi C, Delcroix L, Vignini L, Tos P. Are there risk factors for complications of perforator-based propeller flaps for lower- extremity reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:22762286.

LinkOut - more resources