Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments
- PMID: 26796947
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.006
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments
Abstract
Background: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is widely used and reliable and accurate for assessing the certainty in the body of health evidence. The GRADE working group has provided detailed guidance for assessing the certainty in the body of evidence in systematic reviews and health technology assessments (HTAs) and how to grade the strength of health recommendations. However, there is limited advice regarding how to maximize transparency of these judgments, in particular through explanatory footnotes or explanations in Summary of Findings tables and Evidence Profiles (GRADE evidence tables).
Methods: We conducted this study to define the essential attributes of useful explanations and to develop specific guidance for explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables. We used a sample of explanations according to their complexity, type of judgment involved, and appropriateness from a database of published GRADE evidence tables in Cochrane reviews and World Health Organization guidelines. We used an iterative process and group consensus to determine the attributes and develop guidance.
Results: Explanations in GRADE evidence tables should be concise, informative, relevant, easy to understand, and accurate. We provide general and domain-specific guidance to assist authors with achieving these desirable attributes in their explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables.
Conclusions: Adhering to the general and GRADE domain-specific guidance should improve the quality of explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables, assist authors of systematic reviews, HTA reports, or guidelines with information that they can use in other parts of their evidence synthesis. This guidance will also support editorial evaluation of evidence syntheses using GRADE and provide a minimum quality standard of judgments across tables.
Keywords: Evidence Profile; Explanations; GRADE; GRADEpro; Guidelines; Levels of evidence; Summary of Findings table; Systematic reviews.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 26791431
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 26791430 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews.Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 23;2:81. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-81. Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24059250 Free PMC article.
-
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.2013 Nov 18. In: Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008–. 2013 Nov 18. In: Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008–. PMID: 24404627 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Development and use of health outcome descriptors: a guideline development case study.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 5;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01338-8. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32503619 Free PMC article.
-
Weight-neutral interventions for people with obesity and the perspective of patients, carers and healthcare professionals: a mixed methods review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD016107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016107. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40326567 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of depression and anxiety during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Mar;103(3):423-436. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14734. Epub 2023 Nov 28. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38014572 Free PMC article.
-
Precision nutrition-based interventions for the management of obesity in children and adolescents up to the age of 19 years.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 30;1(1):CD015877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015877. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 39882755
-
Supplemental perioperative intravenous crystalloids for postoperative nausea and vomiting.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 29;3(3):CD012212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012212.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30925195 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources