Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;474(6):1498-505.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4709-3. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

Addition of a Medial Locking Plate to an In Situ Lateral Locking Plate Results in Healing of Distal Femoral Nonunions

Affiliations

Addition of a Medial Locking Plate to an In Situ Lateral Locking Plate Results in Healing of Distal Femoral Nonunions

Michael A Holzman et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Nonunion of the distal femur after lateral plating is associated with axial malalignment, chronic pain, loss of ambulatory function, and decreased knee ROM. The addition of a medial locking plate with autogenous bone grafting can provide greater stability to allow bone healing and may be used to achieve union in these challenging cases.

Questions/purposes: We wished to determine (1) the proportion of patients who achieve radiographic signs of osseous union for distal femoral nonunions with an in situ lateral plate after treatment with addition of a medial locking plate and autogenous bone grafting, and (2) the frequency and types of complications associated with this treatment.

Methods: Between 2007 and 2013, we treated 22 patients for 23 distal femoral nonunions, defined as an unhealed fracture with no radiographic signs of osseous union at a mean of 16 months (SD, 13 months) after injury. During that time, we used a treatment algorithm consisting of treatment in one or two stages. The single-stage procedure performed in 16 aseptic nonunions with a stable lateral plate involved addition of a medial locking plate and autogenous bone graft. A two-stage treatment performed in seven nonunions with lateral plate failure involved placement of a new lateral locking plate followed by addition of a medial locking plate with autogenous bone graft at least 2 months after the first procedure. Of the 22 patients treated, 20 had a median followup of 18 months (SD, 6-94 months). We defined osseous union by bridging bone on three of four cortices with absence of a radiolucent line or more than 25% cross-sectional area of bridging bone via CT.

Results: Twenty of the 21 nonunions attained radiographic signs of osseous union by 12 months. Six of the 20 patients experienced complications: one patient had a persistent nonunion; four patients underwent removal of symptomatic hardware; and one patient experienced skin breakdown at the bone graft harvest site.

Conclusions: A very high proportion of patients achieve union when using medial locking plates to treat distal femoral nonunions after lateral plating of the original injury. Addition of bone graft, staged reconstruction, and revision of the initial lateral plate is indicated when the nonunion is associated with fatigue failure of the initial lateral plate.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The algorithm we used for treatment of distal femoral nonunion after lateral plating is shown.
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 2A–D
The presenting (A) AP and (B) lateral radiographs from an 83-year-old woman (Patient 6) who was referred with a distal femoral nonunion and no signs of progression to healing 9.6 months after lateral plating of a periprosthetic fracture sustained in a fall are shown. The patient’s final (C) AP and (D) lateral radiographs 22 months after medial plating show solid bony union. The plate was intentionally not contoured to sit flush on the bone but rather was contoured to act as a wave plate so bone graft could be packed between the nonunion site and the undersurface of the plate.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ali F, Saleh M. Treatment of distal femoral nonunions by external fixation with simultaneous length and alignment correction. Injury. 2002;33:127–134. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00032-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellabarba C, Ricci WM, Bolhofner BR. Indirect reduction and plating of distal femoral nonunions. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:287–296. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200205000-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. Nonunions: Evaluation and Treatment. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, Krettek C, editors. Skeletal Trauma: Basic Science, Management, and Reconstruction. 4. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2009. pp. 615–707.
    1. Cavusoglu AT, Ozsoy MH, Dincel VE, Sakaogullari A, Basarir K, Ugurlu M. The use of a low-profile Ilizarov external fixator in the treatment of complex fractures and non-unions of the distal femur. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75:209–218. - PubMed
    1. Chan DB, Jeffcoat DM, Lorich DG, Helfet DL. Nonunions around the knee joint. Int Orthop. 2010;34:271–281. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0924-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms