Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;24(3):204-13.
doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0800-8.

The risk of ventricular arrhythmias in a Dutch CRT population: CRT-defibrillator versus CRT-pacemaker

Affiliations

The risk of ventricular arrhythmias in a Dutch CRT population: CRT-defibrillator versus CRT-pacemaker

I A H Ter Horst et al. Neth Heart J. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Patients eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) have an indication for primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, response to CRT might influence processes involved in arrhythmogenesis and therefore change the necessity of ICD therapy in certain patients.

Method: In 202 CRT-defibrillator patients, the association between baseline variables, 6-month echocardiographic outcome (volume response: left ventricular end-systolic volume decrease < ≥15 % and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ >35 %) and the risk of first appropriate ICD therapy was analysed retrospectively.

Results: Fifty (25 %) patients received appropriate ICD therapy during a median follow-up of 37 (23-52) months. At baseline ischaemic cardiomyopathy (hazard ratio (HR) 2.0, p = 0.019) and a B-type natriuretic peptide level > 163 pmol/l (HR 3.8, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of appropriate ICD therapy. After 6 months, 105 (52 %) patients showed volume response and 51 (25 %) reached an LVEF > 35 %. Three (6 %) patients with an LVEF > 35 % received appropriate ICD therapy following echocardiography at ± 6 months compared with 43 patients (29 %) with an LVEF ≤ 35 % (p = 0.001). LVEF post-CRT was more strongly associated to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias than volume response (LVEF > 35 %, HR 0.23, p = 0.020).

Conclusion: Assessing the necessity of an ICD in patients eligible for CRT remains a challenge. Six months post-CRT an LVEF > 35 % identified patients at low risk of ventricular arrhythmias. LVEF might be used at the time of generator replacement to identify patients suitable for downgrading to a CRT-pacemaker.

Keywords: Appropriate ICD; Cardiac resynchronisation therapy; Ventricular arrhythmias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier plots of percent survival free of appropriate ICD therapy after 6-month echocardiogram by (a) volume response and (b) LVEF ≤ > 35 %

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:58. - PubMed
    1. Gold MR, Linde C, Abraham WT, Gardiwal A, Daubert JC. The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in mild heart failure. Hear Rhythm. 2011;8:679–684. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barsheshet A, Wang PJ, Moss AJ, et al. Reverse remodeling and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:2416–2423. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Biase L, Gasparini M, Lunati M, et al. Antiarrhythmic effect of reverse ventricular remodeling induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy. the InSync ICD (Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator) Italian Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1442–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahrzad S, Soleiman NK, Taban S, et al. The effect of Left Ventricular (LV) remodeling on ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) patients (Antiarrhythmic Effect of CRT) Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35:592–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03345.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources