Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:106:143-162.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1775-3. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study

Affiliations

Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study

Peter van den Besselaar et al. Scientometrics. 2016.

Abstract

We take up the issue of performance differences between male and female researchers, and investigate the change of performance differences during the early career. In a previous paper it was shown that among starting researchers gendered performance differences seem small to non-existent (Van Arensbergen et al. 2012). If the differences do not occur in the early career anymore, they may emerge in a later period, or may remain absent. In this paper we use the same sample of male and female researchers, but now compare performance levels about 10 years later. We use various performance indicators: full/fractional counted productivity, citation impact, and relative citation impact in terms of the share of papers in the top 10 % highly cited papers. After the 10 years period, productivity of male researchers has grown faster than of female researcher, but the field normalized (relative) citation impact indicators of male and female researchers remain about equal. Furthermore, performance data do explain to a certain extent why male careers in our sample develop much faster than female researchers' careers; but controlling for performance differences, we find that gender is an important determinant too. Consequently, the process of hiring academic staff still remains biased.

Keywords: Academic careers; Gender bias; Longitudinal study; Performance differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Position by gender
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Position by gender by discipline (%)

References

    1. Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Caprasecca A. Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics. 2009;79(3):517–539. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8. - DOI
    1. Allison PD, Long JS. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review. 1990;55(4):469–478. doi: 10.2307/2095801. - DOI
    1. Astin HS, Bayer A. Pervasive sex differences in the academic reward system: scholarship, marriage, and what else? In: Lewis DR, Becker WE, editors. Academic Rewards in Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1979. pp. 211–229.
    1. Badar K, Hite JM, Badir YF. Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics. 2013;94(2):755–775. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0764-z. - DOI
    1. Bland CJ, Center BA, Finstad DA, Risbey KR, Staples J. The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education. 2006;77(1):89–123. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2006.0002. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources