Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Aug;84(2):232-240.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early esophageal cancers in an older population

Linda C Cummings  1 , Tzuyung Doug Kou  2 , Mark D Schluchter  2 , Amitabh Chak  1 , Gregory S Cooper  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early esophageal cancers in an older population

Linda C Cummings et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancer provides an alternative to esophagectomy, which older patients may not tolerate. Population-based data regarding short-term outcomes and recurrence after endoscopic treatment for esophageal cancer are limited. We compared short-term outcomes, treated recurrence, and survival after endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early esophageal cancers in an older population.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study identifying patients aged ≥66 years with Tis or T1a tumors without nodal involvement diagnosed from 1994 to 2011 from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database.

Results: Of 2193 patients, 41% (n = 893) underwent esophagectomy, and 12% (n = 255) underwent endoscopic treatment within 6 months of diagnosis. Those treated endoscopically were older and more likely to have a Charlson comorbidity score ≥2. A composite endpoint, hospitalization and/or adverse events at 60 days, was higher in surgical patients than in the endoscopic treatment group (30% vs 12%; P < .001). In a Cox model stratified by histology, adjusting for other factors, endoscopic treatment was associated with improved 2-year survival (hazard ratio 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.73).

Conclusions: In this older population, a composite short-term endpoint was worse in the surgical group. Endoscopic treatment was associated with improved survival through 2 years. These results suggest that endoscopic treatment is a reasonable approach for early esophageal cancers in the elderly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stepwise patient selection flowsheet. Percentage in parentheses indicates the proportion of patients excluded at each step. HMO, Health Maintenance Organization; AHRF; Area Health Resources Files
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves for patients undergoing endoscopic treatment versus surgical resection for early esophageal cancer. ET, Endoscopic Treatment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5–29. - PubMed
    1. [accessed 10/18/15];SEER Cancer Statistics Factsheets: Esophageal Cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html.
    1. Chang AC, Ji H, Birkmeyer NJ, Orringer MB, Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes After Transhiatal and Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Cancer. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2008;85(2):424–9. - PubMed
    1. Stein HJMDF, Feith MMD, Bruecher BLDMMD, Naehrig JMD, Sarbia MMD, Siewert JRMDF. Early Esophageal Cancer: Pattern of Lymphatic Spread and Prognostic Factors for Long-Term Survival After Surgical Resection. Annals of Surgery. 2005;242:260–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thosani N, Singh H, Kapadia A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating mucosal versus submucosal invasion of superficial esophageal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2012;75(2):242–53. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms