Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;33(2):167-77.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0284-y. Epub 2016 Jan 23.

The Effectiveness of an Educational Brochure as a Risk Minimization Activity to Communicate Important Rare Adverse Events to Health-Care Professionals

Affiliations

The Effectiveness of an Educational Brochure as a Risk Minimization Activity to Communicate Important Rare Adverse Events to Health-Care Professionals

Nicolette Bester et al. Adv Ther. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Educational brochures are an important tool for communicating risk to health-care professionals. It is important to evaluate the impact of any risk minimization tool to understand the effectiveness of the strategy. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness (i.e., respondents' awareness and understanding of the communication) of a targeted educational brochure distributed to health-care professionals (HCPs) as a risk minimization strategy for the communication of new rare and important adverse events (AEs).

Methods: A prospective, non-interventional, online survey was performed following distribution of a specifically designed brochure highlighting new and important adverse events to a targeted HCP population, consisting of known users of the target medicine, as represented by a commercial database. Predefined multiple-choice survey questions assessed overall HCP awareness of the brochure and understanding and retention of information in those HCPs who reported receiving the brochure.

Results: The educational brochure was sent to a total of 565 HCPs; 121 (21.4%) responded to the survey. The majority of respondents (95.0%) had previously prescribed or dispensed the target medicine. In all, 88 (72.7%) respondents said they had received the educational brochure, of whom 95.5% stated they had at least scanned the main points. More participants who had received the brochure (86.4% to 96.6%) answered the five individual survey questions correctly compared with those who did not (51.5% to 97.0%); this was significant for four out of five questions (P ≤ 0.005). Significantly more HCPs who received the brochure achieved the predefined pass rate (at least four of five questions answered correctly) compared with HCPs who did not receive the brochure (93.2% vs 57.6%, respectively; P = 0.000003).

Conclusions: Distribution of targeted educational brochures may be an effective risk minimization strategy to raise HCP awareness of new rare and important AEs; educational brochures may also be an effective channel for sharing information on how these AEs can be best managed and on the importance and means of reporting AEs.

Funding: Celgene Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.

Keywords: Abraxane; Australia; Brochure; Education; Health-care professionals; Nab-paclitaxel; Risk management plans; Risk minimization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Survey participant demographics. (a) Job role, (b) location. ACT Australian Capital Territory, NSW New South Wales, NT Northern Territory, QLD Queensland, SA South Australia, TAS Tasmania, VIC Victoria, WA Western Australia
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Respondents’ awareness of the communication
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of HCPs who answered/understood the survey questions correctly (a) overall, (b) for each question. HCP health-care professionals

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banerjee AK, Zomerdijk IM, Wooder S, Ingate S, Mayall SJ. Post-approval evaluation of effectiveness of risk minimisation: methods, challenges and interpretation. Drug Saf. 2014;37:33–42. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0126-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edwards B, Chakraborty S. Risk communication and the pharmaceutical industry: what is the reality? Drug Saf. 2012;35:1027–1040. doi: 10.1007/BF03261989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giguère A, Légaré F, Grimshaw J, et al. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD004398. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practice (GVP). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guidelin.... Accessed 4 Nov 2015.
    1. Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). Practical approaches to risk minimisation for medicinal products: report of CIOMS working group IX. http://www.cioms.ch/index.php/publications/available-publications/540/vi.... Accessed 4 Nov 2015.

Publication types