Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
- PMID: 26801810
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.050
Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
Abstract
Objective: To describe the long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for the correction of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction.
Methods: A retrospective electronic medical record review of RALPs from October 2002 to July 2014 was performed, with additional follow-up for patients released from regular urological care obtained by phone. RALP success was defined as resolution of symptoms of UPJ obstruction, improved hydronephrosis radiographically, or resolution of obstruction on follow-up Tc-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan, intravenous pyelogram, or Whitaker test. RALP failure was defined as persistence of symptoms with obstruction demonstrated on functional imaging or requirement for a subsequent UPJ procedure.
Results: A total of 129 cases were identified, with an average patient age of 34.3 years. Stented RALP was performed in 80.6% of cases whereas 19.4% of patients underwent stentless RALP. A dismembered technique was performed in 90.7% of pyeloplasties, whereas 9.3% were nondismembered Fenger, Y-V, or flap pyeloplasties. Five intraoperative complications and 18 postoperative complications (Clavien I-IIIb) were described. One hundred twenty-nine patients received follow-up for a mean of 33.8 months (range 1-147 months). RALP was successful in 125/129 (96.9%), with an 8-year failure-free survival of 91.5%. When considering only stented pyeloplasties, the 8-year failure-free survival was 96.3%.
Conclusion: RALP is a safe and effective minimally invasive method for correction of UPJ obstruction, resulting in lasting improvement in symptoms and resolution of obstruction for most patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.Urology. 2016 Apr;90:110. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.051. Urology. 2016. PMID: 27036680 No abstract available.
-
Author Reply.Urology. 2016 Apr;90:111. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.052. Urology. 2016. PMID: 27036681 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):69.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25791423
-
Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):229.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 12. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 27346071
-
From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Aug;28(8):1012-1018. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0561. Epub 2018 Mar 13. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018. PMID: 29641368
-
The laparoscopic pyeloplasty: is there a role in the age of robotics?Urol Clin North Am. 2015 Feb;42(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 12. Urol Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 25455171 Review.
-
Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19519760 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic versus Open Pyeloplasty: Perioperative and Functional Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 28;12(7):2538. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072538. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37048622 Free PMC article.
-
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic non-dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction due to crossing vessels: A matched-paired analysis and review of literature.Asian J Urol. 2018 Jul;5(3):172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 6. Asian J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29988898 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a valid option for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair in adults with congenital renal abnormalities: a case series study.BMC Urol. 2023 Aug 19;23(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01308-4. BMC Urol. 2023. PMID: 37598164 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty as management for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a comparison study with primary pyeloplasty.Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1278-1285. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.25. Transl Androl Urol. 2020. PMID: 32676411 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy.Res Rep Urol. 2020 Nov 10;12:555-562. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S238823. eCollection 2020. Res Rep Urol. 2020. PMID: 33204662 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources