Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 5;26(6):292-9.
doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140240. Epub 2016 Jan 23.

Prognostic Value of Drinking Status and Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Polymorphism in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations

Prognostic Value of Drinking Status and Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Polymorphism in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Daisuke Kawakita et al. J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: The association between alcohol drinking, aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) polymorphism, and survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 267 HNSCC patients at Aichi Cancer Center. Of these, 65 patients (24%) were non-drinkers, 104 (39%) were light drinkers (ethanol <46 g or <5 days/week), 46 (17%) were moderate drinkers (ethanol intake 46-68 g/day and ≥5 days/week), and 52 (20%) were heavy drinkers (ethanol intake ≥69 g and ≥5 days/week). The prognostic value of pre-treatment drinking status and ALDH2 polymorphism was investigated using multivariate proportional hazard models.

Results: Drinking status was associated with disease-free survival (DFS) in HNSCC patients, with marginal statistical significance (5-year DFS: 67.9% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 53.8-78.4%] for non-drinkers, 57.6% [95% CI, 47.4-66.6%] for light drinkers, 46.1% [95% CI, 30.8-60.1%] for moderate drinkers, and 43.5% [95% CI, 29.3-56.9%] for heavy drinkers; P = 0.088). However, this association lost significance when multivariate analyses were adjusted for established prognostic factors. ALDH2 genotype was not significantly associated with DFS in HNSCC patients (5-year DFS: 85.7% [95% CI, 53.9-96.2%] for Lys/Lys, 56.2% [95% CI, 47.4-64.1%] for Glu/Lys, and 50.5% [95% CI, 40.3-59.7%] for Glu/Glu; P = 0.154). After stratification by ALDH2 genotype, we observed a significant positive dose-response relationship between drinking status and DFS in HNSCC patients with ALDH2 Glu/Glu (Ptrend = 0.029).

Conclusions: In this study, we identified a significant positive dose-response relationship between pre-treatment drinking status and DFS in HNSCC patients with ALDH2 Glu/Glu. To confirm this association, further study is warranted.

<背景>: 飲酒習慣とALDH2遺伝子多型の頭頸部癌予後への影響は明らかでない。

<方法>: 愛知県がんセンター中央病院を受診した頭頸部扁平上皮癌患者267例を対象に、後ろ向きコホート研究を実施した。飲酒習慣に関しては、65人(24%)が非飲酒者、104人(39%)が軽度飲酒者 (エタノール46g未満/日、頻度5日/週未満)、46人(17%)が中等度飲酒者(エタノール46g以上69g未満、頻度5日/週以上)、52人(20%)が重度飲酒者(エタノール69g以上、頻度5日/週以上)であった。治療前飲酒習慣とALDH2遺伝子多型の予後への影響は、Cox比例ハザードモデルを用いて評価した。

<結果>: 飲酒習慣は頭頸部扁平上皮癌患者の無病生存へ影響を示した[5年無病生存率: 非飲酒者;67.9%(53.8-78.4)、軽度飲酒者;57.6%(47.4-66.6)、中等度飲酒者;46.1%(30.8-60.1)、重度飲酒者;43.5%(29.3-56.9)、P=0.088]。しかしながら、その関係性は他の予後因子を調整した多変量解析では一致しなかった。またALDH2遺伝子多型は無病生存と有意な関連を示さなかった[5年無病生存率: Lys/Lys;85.7%(53.9-96.2)、Glu/Lys;56.2%(47.4-64.1)、Glu/Glu;50.5%(40.3-59.7)、P= 0.154]。ALDH2遺伝子多型に基づいて層別化解析を行うと、ALDH2 Glu/Gluの患者群では飲酒習慣は無病生存に有意な正の量反応関係を示した (Ptrend= 0.029)。

<結論>: 今回我々はALDH2 Glu/Gluの頭頸部扁平上皮癌患者において、治療前飲酒習慣と無病生存の間に有意な正の量反応関係が存在することを示した。この関連を明らかにするためには、さらなる研究による検証が必要である。

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Kaplan Meier survival curves for drinking status in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Five-year disease-free survival was 67.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.8–78.4%) for non-drinkers, 57.6% (95% CI, 47.4–66.6%) for light drinkers, 46.1% (95% CI, 30.8–60.1%) for moderate drinkers, and 43.5% (95% CI, 29.3–56.9%) for heavy drinkers (logrank test, P = 0.088).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan Meier survival curves for aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) genotype in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Five-year disease-free survival was 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.9–96.2%) for ALDH2 Lys/Lys patients, 56.2% (95% CI, 47.4–64.1%) for ALDH2 Glu/Lys patients, and 50.5% (95% CI, 40.3–59.7%) for ALDH2 Glu/Glu patients (logrank test, P = 0.154).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Kaplan Meier survival curves of disease-free survival for drinking status according to aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) Glu/Glu genotype. Five-year disease-free survival among ALDH2 Glu/Lys patients was 63.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.4–78.2%) for non-drinkers, 55.1% (95% CI, 40.8–67.3%) for light drinkers, 47.1% (95% CI, 25.2–66.3%) for moderate drinkers, and 56.8% (95% CI, 37.3–72.3%) for heavy drinkers (logrank test, P = 0.764). Respective rates among ALDH2 Glu/Glu patients were 59.4% (95% CI, 30.9–79.4%), 60.6% (95% CI, 44.8–73.2%), 44.6% (95% CI, 23.5–63.8%), and 21.1% (95% CI, 5.8–42.7%) (logrank test, P = 0.023).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917. 10.1002/ijc.25516 - DOI - PubMed
    1. IARC. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. Washington DC: IARC; 2007.
    1. Hashibe M, Brennan P, Benhamou S, Castellsague X, Chen C, Curado MP, et al. Alcohol drinking in never users of tobacco, cigarette smoking in never drinkers, and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:777–89. 10.1093/jnci/djk179 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eriksson CJ. The role of acetaldehyde in the actions of alcohol (update 2000). Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25 (5 Suppl ISBRA):15S–32S. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02369.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seitz HK, Stickel F. Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:599–612. 10.1038/nrc2191 - DOI - PubMed

Substances