Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 26804969
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005
Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare short implants (equal or less than 8mm) versus standard implants (larger than 8mm) placed in posterior regions of maxilla and mandible, evaluating survival rates of implants, marginal bone loss, complications and prosthesis failures.
Data: This review has been registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42015016588. Main search terms were used in combination: dental implant, short implant, short dental implants, short dental implants posterior, short dental implants maxilla, and short dental implants mandible.
Source: An electronic search for data published up until September/2015 was undertaken using the PubMed/Medline, Embase and The Cochrane Library databases.
Study selection: Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies, randomized controlled trials and/or prospective studies, which evaluated short implants in comparison to standard implants in the same study.
Conclusion: The search identified 1460 references, after inclusion criteria 13 studies were assessed for eligibility. A total of 1269 patients, who had received a total of 2631 dental implants. The results showed that there was no significant difference of implants survival (P=.24; RR:1.35; CI: 0.82-2.22), marginal bone loss (P=.06; MD: -0.20; CI: -0.41 to 0.00), complications (P=.08; RR:0.54; CI: 0.27-1.09) and prosthesis failures (P=.92; RR:0.96; CI: 0.44-2.09). Short implants are considered a predictable treatment for posterior jaws. However, short implants with length less than 8 mm (4-7 mm) should be used with caution because they present greater risks to failures compared to standard implants.
Clinical significance: Short implants are frequently placed in the posterior area in order to avoid complementary surgical procedures. However, clinicians need to be aware that short implants with length less than 8mm present greater risk of failures.
Keywords: Complications; Edentulous jaws partially; Marginal bone loss; Meta-analysis; Prosthesis failures.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Comment in
-
Short implants had lower survival rates in posterior jaws compared to standard implants.Evid Based Dent. 2016 Dec;17(4):115-116. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401205. Evid Based Dent. 2016. PMID: 27980324
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010. PMID: 20467595
-
The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7 Suppl 2:S171-89. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014. PMID: 24977252
-
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD006697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006697.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22336822 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;(7):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub4. PMID: 17943800 Updated.
-
Short implant versus conventional implant in the posterior atrophic maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Oct 1;24(4):320-328. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_226_24. Epub 2024 Oct 15. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024. PMID: 40227936 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clinical performance of additively manufactured subperiosteal implants: a systematic review.Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Feb 5;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00521-6. Int J Implant Dent. 2024. PMID: 38315326 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 14;11(1):8152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87507-1. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33854095 Free PMC article.
-
Implant placement with inferior alveolar nerve repositioning in the posterior mandible.J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Dec 31;49(6):347-353. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.6.347. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023. PMID: 38155088 Free PMC article.
-
Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Partially Edentulous Atrophic Posterior Mandible with Short Implants (≤ 8 mm) Compared with the Sandwich Osteotomy and Delayed Placement of Standard Length Implants (> 8 mm): a Systematic Review.J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018 Jun 29;9(2):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2018.9202. eCollection 2018 Apr-Jun. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018. PMID: 30116514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study.Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jan 22;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0155-1. Int J Implant Dent. 2019. PMID: 30666468 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical