Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Dec;123(13):2199-2207.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13855. Epub 2016 Jan 24.

Maternal positioning to correct occiput posterior fetal position during the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Maternal positioning to correct occiput posterior fetal position during the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial

M J Guittier et al. BJOG. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the hands and knees position during the first stage of labour to facilitate the rotation of the fetal head to the occiput anterior position.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.

Population: A total of 439 women with a fetus in the occiput posterior position during the first stage of labour.

Methods: The women in the intervention group were invited to take a hands and knees position for at least for 10 minutes. Women allocated to the control group received the usual care. For both groups, 15 minutes after randomisation, women completed a short questionnaire to report their perceived pain and the comfort of their position.

Main outcome measures: The rotation of the fetal head in occiput anterior position confirmed by ultrasonography 1 hour after randomisation.

Results: One hour after the randomisation, 35 of 203 (17%) fetuses were diagnosed as being in the occiput anterior position in the intervention group compared with 24 of 209 (12%) in the control group. This difference was not statistically significant (relative risk 1.50; 95% CI 0.93-2.43; P = 0.13). The change in the evaluation of comfort between the randomisation and 15 minutes after showed an improvement in 70 and 39 women, no change in 82 and 78 women and a decrease in 56 and 86 women in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: This study could not demonstrate a benefit of the hands and knees position to correct the occiput posterior position of the fetus during the first stage of labour, but the women reported an increase in their comfort level.

Tweetable abstract: Hands and knees position does not facilitate rotation into occiput anterior but increases the comfort level of women.

Keywords: Fetal head position; first stage of labour; maternal comfort; maternal position; occiput posterior; randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two examples of hands and knees positions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.

Comment in

References

    1. Akmal ET, Howard R, Osei E, Nicolaides KH. Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:425–8. - PubMed
    1. Fitzpatrick M, McQillan K, O'Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1027–31. - PubMed
    1. Gardberg M, Laakkonen E, Salevaara M. Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:746–9. - PubMed
    1. Le Ray C, Serres P, Schmitz T, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:873–9. - PubMed
    1. Simkin P. The fetal occiput posterior position: state of the science and a new perspective. Birth 2010;37:61–71. - PubMed

Publication types