Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;104(1):47-51.
doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.007.

Performance of a mixed filter to identify relevant studies for mixed studies reviews

Reem El Sherif, Pierre Pluye, Genevieve Gore, Vera Granikov, Quan Nha Hong

Performance of a mixed filter to identify relevant studies for mixed studies reviews

Reem El Sherif et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: Mixed studies reviews include empirical studies with diverse designs. Given that identifying relevant studies for such reviews is time consuming, a mixed filter was developed.

Methods: The filter was used for six journals from three disciplines. For each journal, database records were coded "empirical" (relevant) when they mentioned a research question or objective, data collection, analysis, and results. We measured precision (proportion of retrieved documents being relevant), sensitivity (proportion of relevant documents retrieved), and specificity (proportion of nonrelevant documents not retrieved).

Results: Records were coded with and without the filter, and descriptive statistics were performed, suggesting the mixed filter has high sensitivity.

Keywords: Database, Bibliographic; Empirical Research; Information Retrieval Systems; Medical Informatics; Review, Systematic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Larsen PO, von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 2010 Sep;84(3):575–603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29–45. - PubMed
    1. Shaw RL, Larkin M, Flowers P. Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Evid Based Med. Dec. 19(6):201–3. - PubMed
    1. Kastner M, Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Lillie E, Perrier L, Horsley T, Welch V, Cogo E, Antony J, Straus SE. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? protocol for a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 3;12:114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10(suppl 1):6–20. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources