Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0146976.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146976. eCollection 2016.

Global Expanded Nutrient Supply (GENuS) Model: A New Method for Estimating the Global Dietary Supply of Nutrients

Affiliations

Global Expanded Nutrient Supply (GENuS) Model: A New Method for Estimating the Global Dietary Supply of Nutrients

Matthew R Smith et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Insufficient data exist for accurate estimation of global nutrient supplies. Commonly used global datasets contain key weaknesses: 1) data with global coverage, such as the FAO food balance sheets, lack specific information about many individual foods and no information on micronutrient supplies nor heterogeneity among subnational populations, while 2) household surveys provide a closer approximation of consumption, but are often not nationally representative, do not commonly capture many foods consumed outside of the home, and only provide adequate information for a few select populations. Here, we attempt to improve upon these datasets by constructing a new model--the Global Expanded Nutrient Supply (GENuS) model--to estimate nutrient availabilities for 23 individual nutrients across 225 food categories for thirty-four age-sex groups in nearly all countries. Furthermore, the model provides historical trends in dietary nutritional supplies at the national level using data from 1961-2011. We determine supplies of edible food by expanding the food balance sheet data using FAO production and trade data to increase food supply estimates from 98 to 221 food groups, and then estimate the proportion of major cereals being processed to flours to increase to 225. Next, we estimate intake among twenty-six demographic groups (ages 20+, both sexes) in each country by using data taken from the Global Dietary Database, which uses nationally representative surveys to relate national averages of food consumption to individual age and sex-groups; for children and adolescents where GDD data does not yet exist, average calorie-adjusted amounts are assumed. Finally, we match food supplies with nutrient densities from regional food composition tables to estimate nutrient supplies, running Monte Carlo simulations to find the range of potential nutrient supplies provided by the diet. To validate our new method, we compare the GENuS estimates of nutrient supplies against independent estimates by the USDA for historical US nutrition and find very good agreement for 21 of 23 nutrients, though sodium and dietary fiber will require further improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following competing interests: Dr. Mozaffarian reports ad hoc honoraria or consulting from Bunge, Haas Avocado Board, Nutrition Impact, Amarin, Astra Zeneca, Boston Heart Diagnostics, GOED, and Life Sciences Research Organization; and scientific advisory boards, Unilever North America and Elysium Health. we confirm that Dr. Mozaffarian’s competing interests do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors have declared no competing interests exist. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. GENuS = FBS Disaggregation Comparison.
Example of a comparison of FBS domestic supply values for all countries with summed GENuS model estimates. GENuS estimates are calculated by summing the supplies of the constituent foods (“Buckwheat”, “Fonio”, “Triticale”, “Mixed Grain”, “Popcorn”, “Quinoa”, “Canary Seed”, and “Cereals, nes (not elsewhere specified)”) and comparing them to the values supplied in the FAO food balance sheets listed as “Cereals, Other”.
Fig 2
Fig 2. GENuS-USDA Nutrient Supply Comparison.
Comparisons of GENuS model estimates and USDA nutrient supplies (data available in S1 Data). To compare GENuS estimates with historical data (where fortification levels are not estimated), the USDA supplies shown exclude nutrients added through fortification. A comparison of the USDA values and the GENuS model including fortification is found in Table 3.

References

    1. Drewnowski AD, Popkin BM. The nutrition transition: New trends in the global diet. Nutr Rev. 1997. February; 55(2): 31–43. - PubMed
    1. Grigg D. The pattern of world protein consumption. Geoforum. 1995. February; 26(1): 1–17.
    1. de Boer J, Helms M, Aiking H. Protein consumption and sustainability: Diet diversity in EU-15. Ecol Econ. 2006. September 20; 59(3): 267–274. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.011 - DOI
    1. Albala C, Vio F, Kain J, Uauy R. Nutrition transition in Chile: determinants and consequences. Public Health Nutr. 2002; 5(1A): 123–128. 10.1079/phn2001283 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silventoinen K, Sans S, Tolonen H, Monterde D, Kuulasmaa K, Kesteloot H, et al. Trends in obesity and energy supply in the WHO MONICA Project. Int J Obes. 2004. March 9; 28: 710–718. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802614 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms