Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;30(1):51-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6638-5.

Mendelian Randomization and Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Mendelian Randomization and Type 2 Diabetes

Daniel I Swerdlow. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a common, complex disease that poses a substantial burden on individual and population health, but we have relatively limited understanding of its underlying pathophysiology. Observational studies have highlighted large numbers of risk factors for T2DM, some of which are modifiable through behavioural or pharmacological intervention. Determining which of these risk factors plays a causal role in the development of T2DM has been a challenge, but Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies are harnessing genetic data in population studies to offer new insights. Using evolving analytical methods, MR studies continue to address questions of causality related to T2DM, including exploring the roles of adiposity, blood lipids and inflammation. The causal roles of a number of important modifiable risk factors have been confirmed by MR studies, while the relevance of others has been called into question. As more MR studies are conducted, methods are developed and refined in order to make the most efficient and reliable use of available genetic and phenotypic data. In this review, the design and findings of some important MR studies related to T2DM are explored and their relevance for translation to clinical practice considered.

Keywords: Causal inference; Mendelian randomisation; Risk factors; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mendelian randomisation studies in type 2 diabetes. MR studies can help to demonstrate the causal relevance of a biomarker or risk factor to risk of developing T2DM. They can also incorporate proteomic, metabolomics, and transcriptomic data, and other bioinformatics resources in order to investigate the biological pathways linking the gene to disease aetiology

References

    1. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Whitlock G, Lewington S, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1083–1096. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ezzati M, Riboli E. Behavioral and dietary risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:954–964. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1203528. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zaccardi F, O’Donovan G, Webb DR, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 23-year cohort study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Atherosclerosis. 2015;243:131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.09.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCarthy MI, Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, et al. Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:356–369. doi: 10.1038/nrg2344. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ. 2009;338:b1665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1665. - DOI - PMC - PubMed