Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 25:58:8.
doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0190-y.

Bovine respiratory syncytial virus outbreak reduced bulls' weight gain and feed conversion for eight months in a Norwegian beef herd

Affiliations

Bovine respiratory syncytial virus outbreak reduced bulls' weight gain and feed conversion for eight months in a Norwegian beef herd

Thea Blystad Klem et al. Acta Vet Scand. .

Abstract

Background: Cost-benefit evaluation of measures against respiratory disease in cattle requires accounting with the associated production losses. Investigations of naturally occurring respiratory infections in a herd setting are an opportunity for accurate estimates of the consequences. This article presents estimates based on individual monitoring of weight and concentrate intake of several hundred bulls previous to, during and after a respiratory infection outbreak with bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) as the main pathogen. The aim of the study was to analyse the association between exposure to BRSV, weight gain and feed conversion rate, quantify any change in these parameters, and estimate the duration of the change in production.

Results: A comparison of growth curves for the bulls that were present during the outbreak revealed that bulls with severe clinical signs had a clear and consistent trend of poorer growth rate than those with milder or no signs. The weight/age-ratio was 0.04-0.10 lower in the severely affected bulls, and evident throughout the study period of 8 months. A comparison of growth rates between apparently healthy bulls being present during the outbreak and a comparable group of bulls exactly 1 year later (n = 377) showed a reduced growth rate of 111 g/day in the first group. The difference amounted to 23 extra days needed to reach the reference weight. Feed conversion was also reduced by 79 g weight gain/kilogram concentrate consumed in the outbreak year.

Conclusion: This study indicates significant negative effects on performance of animals that develop severe clinical signs in the acute stage, and that the growth and production is negatively affected many months after apparent recovery. In addition, the performance of apparently healthy animals that are exposed during an outbreak are severely negatively affected. The duration of this decrease in production in animals after recovery, or animals that have not shown disease at all, has not previously been documented. These losses will easily be underestimated, but contribute significantly to the costs for the producer. The findings emphasize the importance of BRSV infection for profitability and animal welfare in cattle husbandry. The study also illustrates that utilising intra-herd comparison of health and production parameters is a productive approach to estimate consequences of an outbreak.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Similar age composition over time in two groups of bulls. The two graphs show similar curve shapes after excluding bulls born before a certain date (June 1, 2011) from data set. About 80 bulls were removed from a set of 220 bulls
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of degree of maximum drop in bulls’ individual body weight during bovine respiratory outbreak. Reduction in percent of body weight, corresponding to proportion of bulls. N = 225
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Weight to age ratio in two groups of bulls present during outbreak. Bulls that were diagnosed and treated for respiratory disease versus those without diagnosis and treatment. The figure shows the ratio in relation to the outbreak date 24 January 2011
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Weight to age ratio in two groups of bulls, year versus year comparison. Comparison of bulls without a diagnosis of respiratory disease monitored in the test centre during 2011 (Year 1) versus 2012 (Year 2). Respiratory disease outbreak date in 2011 is denoted by vertical line

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Snowder GD, Van Vleck LD, Cundiff LV, Bennett GL. Bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle: environmental, genetic, and economic factors. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:1999–2008. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaneene JB, Scott Hurd H. The national animal health monitoring system in Michigan. III. Cost estimates of selected dairy cattle diseases. Prev Vet Med. 1990;8:127–140. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(90)90006-4. - DOI
    1. Griffin D. Economic impact associated with respiratory disease in beef cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1997;13:367–377. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30302-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schneider MJ, Tait RG, Jr, Busby WD, Reecy JM. An evaluation of bovine respiratory disease complex in feedlot cattle: impact on performance and carcass traits using treatment records and lung lesion scores. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:1821–1827. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1283. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaudeau F, Ohlson A, Emanuelson U. Associations between bovine coronavirus and bovine respiratory syncytial virus infections and animal performance in Swedish dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:1523–1533. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2511. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms