Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb:81:84-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

Evaluation of the radiological criteria to diagnose large vestibular aqueduct syndrome

Affiliations

Evaluation of the radiological criteria to diagnose large vestibular aqueduct syndrome

Mohamed M El-Badry et al. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of the current work is to increase the sensitivity of the radiological diagnosis of the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS). The specific aims were to compare between the two famous criteria to diagnose large vestibular aqueduct (LVA), (i.e., Valvassori and Cincinnati), to correlate between vestibular aqueduct (VA) measurements in the axial view and those in 45° oblique reformate in children with LVAS, and to define radiological criteria to diagnose LVA in the 45° oblique reformate.

Methods: The study group included 61 children with LVAS according to Cincinnati criteria (greater than 0.9mm at the midpoint or greater than 1.9mm at the operculum in the axial view). All participants were subjected to full Audiological evaluation and CT scanning in axial plane. The axial data were then transferred to workstation for post-processing with 3D reformatting software (Baxara 3D) in order to obtain the 45° oblique reformates. VA measurements were done at 4 points: midpoint and operculum in both the axial plane and the 45° oblique reformate.

Results: Only 81% of ears of children with LVAS (99 ears) fit Valvassori criterion (i.e., larger than 1.5mm at midpoint), while 19% (23 ears) of them were missed. There were statistically significant correlations among the diameters of the VA in the axial view (both in the midpoint and operculum) and their counterparts in the 45° oblique reformate. Values equal to or greater than 1.2mm in the midpoint and 1.3mm in the operculum are proposed to be the criteria to diagnose LVA in the 45° oblique reformate. Finally, no significant correlations were found between the degree of hearing loss and VA diameters at the axial or 45° oblique reformate.

Conclusion: Cincinnati criteria are more sensitive than Valvassori criterin in the diagnosis of LVAS. We recommend the application of Cincinnati criteria instead of Valvassori criteria in order not miss cases with LVAS. Measurement of VA in the 45° oblique reformate is a reliable method to diagnose LVA. Criteria to diagnose LVA in the 45° oblique reformate were proposed.

Keywords: 45° oblique reformate; CT scanning; Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome; Sensorineural hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by