Validation of the modified Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale-based triage system emphasizing the physiologic variables or mechanism of injuries
- PMID: 26810318
- PMCID: PMC4726641
- DOI: 10.1186/s12245-015-0097-9
Validation of the modified Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale-based triage system emphasizing the physiologic variables or mechanism of injuries
Abstract
Background: The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale is a valid triage system. The system was translated and implemented in the Japanese emergency departments (EDs) from 2012. This system was named the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale; however, the validation studies of the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale have been limited. In addition, for a patient with multiple complaints, it could become challenging, due to its requirement of a single complaint. Therefore, we hypothesized that a modified version of the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale using first-order modifiers without chief complaint detection is accurate.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated a correlation between the modified triage scale level and outcomes of all adult emergency department patients at a Japanese hospital. Construct validity of the modified triage scale level was assessed based on comparisons of total admission rate (including hospitalizations, emergency department deaths) and length of stay between triage levels.
Results: The distributions of five levels of the triage scale (level 1 is the most urgent) among the 17,121 cases are as follows: 1:451, 2:1148, 3:7703, 4:7652, and 5:167. Total admission rates by each level were 1:89.8, 2:68.2, 3:26.4, 4:6.6, and 5:0.6 %, which progressively increased from level 5 to 1 and were significant (p < 0.01). Compared with patients in level 3, the odds of total admission rates were 14.4, 5.1, 0.27, and 0.030 for the patients in levels 1, 2, 4, and 5. The length of stay was longer in the patients with the more urgent levels except for those with level 1.
Conclusions: The modified version of the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale is a valid predictor of total admission and length of stay and may enable the nurses to triage patients without detecting the chief complaints.
Keywords: Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale; Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale; Patient safety; Triage.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012. PMID: 22858740
-
Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in adults: a cohort study.Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):384-388. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207214. Epub 2018 Mar 13. Emerg Med J. 2018. PMID: 29535086
-
Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in elderly patients: A cohort study.Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2159-2164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 8. Am J Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30876775
-
The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation.Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):71-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 2. Ann Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22305329 Clinical Trial.
-
The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: A Canadian perspective on emergency department triage.Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003 Feb;15(1):6-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00400.x. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003. PMID: 12656779
Cited by
-
Validation of chief complaints, medical history, medications, and physician diagnoses structured with an integrated emergency department information system in Japan: the Next Stage ER system.Acute Med Surg. 2020 Aug 27;7(1):e554. doi: 10.1002/ams2.554. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Acute Med Surg. 2020. PMID: 32884825 Free PMC article.
-
Over-triage occurs when considering the patient's pain in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS).PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216519. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31071132 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing a common ground: the future of triage systems.BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 15;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01070-2. BMC Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39148042 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency, Prognosis, and Clinical Features of Unexpected versus Expected Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2509. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092509. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38731038 Free PMC article.
-
Unique characteristics of frequent presenters to the emergency department in a Japanese population: a retrospective analysis.Acute Med Surg. 2019 Feb 19;6(2):145-151. doi: 10.1002/ams2.395. eCollection 2019 Apr. Acute Med Surg. 2019. PMID: 30976440 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fernandes CMB, McLeod S, Krause J, Shah A, Jewell J, Smith B, et al. Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department. CJEM. 2013;15:227–232. - PubMed
-
- Vertesi L. Does the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale identify non-urgent patients who can be triaged away from the emergency department? CJEM. 2004;6:337–342. - PubMed
-
- Lee JY, Oh SH, Peck EH, Lee JM, Park KN, Kim SH, et al. The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:68. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-68. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources