Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;20(3):903-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11325-015-1304-x. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

Three-dimensional assessment of anatomical balance and oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnoea

Affiliations

Three-dimensional assessment of anatomical balance and oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnoea

Kate Sutherland et al. Sleep Breath. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Mandibular advancement splints (MAS) are an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS are not equally efficacious across all patients and the reasons are not well understood. Craniofacial and upper airway structure individually influence MAS response. We aimed to assess anatomical balance, defined as the ratio of upper airway soft tissue (ST) volume to maxillomandibular enclosure volume, between MAS treatment responders and non-responders.

Methods: OSA patients (apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) >10 h(-1)) were recruited for MAS treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway was performed during wakefulness without and with MAS in situ. Images were processed for volumetric analysis of upper airway soft tissues (tongue, soft palate, paraphayrngeal fat pads and lateral pharyngeal walls) and three-dimensional cephalometry to acquire intra-mandibular space area (IMA) and total maxillomandibular (Mm) volume. Anatomical balance ratios were compared between MAS treatment responders (AHI <10 h(-1) + 50 % reduction) and non-responders.

Results: Image analysis was completed in 69 patients (68 % male, age 50.5 ± 10.1 years, BMI 29.6 ± 5.0 kgm(2), AHI 27.0 ± 14.7 h(-1)) including 36 responders. Soft tissue volumes did not differ between MAS responders and non-responders. Non-responders had increased ST/IMA compared to responders (4.9 ± 0.6 vs. 4.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.031). In multivariate logistic regression with AHI and BMI, ST/IMA was the only predictive variable (p = 0.036, ROC AUC 0.7). However, changes in ST/Mm did not directly relate to treatment response.

Conclusions: Anatomical imbalance assessed by intra-mandibular space area was associated with poor MAS treatment response. However, changes in anatomical balance with mandibular advancement did not reflect treatment outcome as static imaging may not adequately capture improvements in upper airway function.

Keywords: Anatomical balance; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mandibular advancement; Obstructive sleep apnoea; Oral appliances; Upper airway.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Respir J. 2011 Aug;38(2):348-58 - PubMed
    1. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Feb;111(2):239-43 - PubMed
    1. Sleep. 2009 Jan;32(1):37-45 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 2011 Jun;139(6):1331-1339 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Aug 15;11(8):861-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources