Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct-Dec;32(4):261-7.
doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.171242.

Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers

Prachi Kumar  1 , Rahul Bhargava  1 , Yogesh C Arora  2 , Sidharth Kaushal  3 , Manjushri Kumar  4
Affiliations

Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers

Prachi Kumar et al. J Cytol. 2015 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Aims: Prolonged contact lens wear is often accompanied by dryness of the eyes. The aim of this study was to compare conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and tear film tests such as tear film break up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers and measure their correlation with dry eye symptoms.

Setting: A case control study was done at three referral eye centers.

Materials and methods: The eyes of 230 contact lens users were compared to 250 eyes of age- and sex-matched controls. Participants were recruited based on their response to a questionnaire of dry eye symptoms, (Dry Eye Scoring System, DESS(©)) and measurements of TBUT, Schirmer test, and CIC was done. A correlation analysis between symptom severity and tear film tests was performed. Pearson's coefficient, R(2) > 0.5 was considered significant.

Results: As compared to controls (r (2) = 0.010), Nelson grade correlated significantly with dry eye symptoms (r (2) = 0.765), among cases. However, there was moderate correlation between dry eye symptoms, Schirmer test, and TBUT (r (2) = 0.557 and 0.530, respectively) among cases and a weak correlation among controls (r (2) = 0.130 and 0.054, respectively). The sensitivity of TBUT was 86.4%, specificity was 82.4%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 4.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.46-5.85)], and negative LR was 0.09. The sensitivity of the Schirmer test was 48.2%, specificity 88%, LR 2.12 (95% CI 1.48-2.96), and negative LR 0.83.

Conclusion: CIC correlates better than Schirmer and TBUT with dry eye symptoms. It may be the most appropriate test for dry-eye evaluation in contact lens wearers.

Keywords: Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC); contact lens; dry eye; lens wear time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatter plot showing correlation of Schirmer test dry eye symptoms
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot showing correlation of TBUT with dry eye symptoms
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plot showing correlation of Nelson grade with dry eye symptoms
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative PAS- and H and E-stained images at 100× magnification showing abundant goblet cells
Figure 5
Figure 5
Representative PAS- and H and E-stained images at 400× magnification showing squamous metaplasia
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Lemp MA, Bielory L. Contact lenses and associated anterior segment disorders: Dry eye disease, blepharitis, and allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2008;28:105. - PubMed
    1. Tomlinson A. Epidemiology of dry eye disease. In: Asbell PA, Lemp MA, editors. Dry Eye Disease. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 2006. pp. 1–15.
    1. Bhargava R, Kumar P. Oral omega-3 fatty acid treatment for dry eye in contact lens wearers. Cornea. 2015;34:413–20. - PubMed
    1. Ramamoorthy P, Sinnott LT, Nichols JJ. Treatment, material, care, and patient-related factors in contact lens-related dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:764–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. The repeatability of clinical measurements of dry eye. Cornea. 2004;23:272–85. - PubMed