Comparison of postoperative complications in advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone
- PMID: 26811595
- PMCID: PMC4711224
- DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.171548
Comparison of postoperative complications in advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone
Abstract
Background: Head and neck cancer is the third most common cancer in India with 60% presenting in advanced stages. There is the emerging role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the management of these advanced cancers. There is a general perception that complication rates are higher with the use of NACT.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospectively collected data of head and neck cancer patients operated at our hospital from March 2013 to September 2014. A total of 205 patients were included in the study. These patients were studied in two groups. Group 1 included 153 patients who underwent surgery alone, and Group 2 included 52 patients who received 2-3 cycles of NACT followed by surgery.
Results: The mean age of the population was 51 years in the Group 1 and 45 years in Group 2. The hospital stay and readmissions in postoperative period were similar in the two groups. In this study, the complication rate was 37.9% in the surgery patients and 30.8% in the NACT patients (P = 0.424).
Conclusion: The postoperative complication rates in patients who received NACT followed by surgery were not significantly different from those who underwent surgery.
Keywords: Complications; head and neck cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; surgery.
Similar articles
-
Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Postoperative Morbidity in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma.Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Jun;34(3):186-90. doi: 10.4143/crt.2002.34.3.186. Cancer Res Treat. 2002. PMID: 26680861
-
A comparative analysis on clinical efficacy of FOLFOX6 regimen and DCF regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer.J BUON. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):2006-2012. J BUON. 2019. PMID: 31786868
-
Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.Radiol Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;52(3):307-319. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0030. Radiol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30210049 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-utility comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer in patients 65 years old or older.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):763.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.053. Epub 2015 Jan 31. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25644442 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical and pathological results of gastric cancer patients: A case-control study.J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;121(5):833-839. doi: 10.1002/jso.25839. Epub 2020 Jan 14. J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31943232
References
-
- Patel UA, Lynn-Macrae A, Rosen F, Holloway N, Kern R. Advanced stage of head and neck cancer at a tertiary-care county hospital. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1473–7. - PubMed
-
- Otto S. 4th ed. London: Mosby; 2001. Oncology Nursing.
-
- Patil VM, Noronha V, Joshi A, Muddu VK, Gulia S, Bhosale B, et al. Induction chemotherapy in technically unresectable locally advanced oral cavity cancers: Does it make a difference? Indian J Cancer. 2013;50:1–8. - PubMed
-
- Vermorken JB, Remenar E, van Herpen C, Gorlia T, Mesia R, Degardin M, et al. Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel in unresectable head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1695–704. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources