Reproducibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy: Multi-Institutional External Validation by a Propensity Score Matched Cohort
- PMID: 26812301
- PMCID: PMC7511981
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.102
Reproducibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy: Multi-Institutional External Validation by a Propensity Score Matched Cohort
Abstract
Purpose: As the adoption of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy expands, the reproducibility of outcomes at expert centers becomes essential. We sought to validate the comprehensive NCI (National Cancer Institute) experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided biopsy in an external, independent, matched cohort of patients.
Materials and methods: We compared 620 patients enrolled in a prospective trial comparing systematic biopsy to fusion guided biopsy at NCI to 310 who underwent a similar procedure at Long Island Jewish Medical Center. The propensity score, defined as the probability of being treated outside NCI, was calculated using the estimated logistic regression model. Patients from the hospital were matched 1:1 for age, prostate specific antigen, magnetic resonance imaging suspicion score and prior negative biopsies. Clinically significant disease was defined as Gleason 3 + 4 or greater.
Results: Before matching we found differences between the cohorts in age, magnetic resonance imaging suspicion score (each p <0.001), the number of patients with prior negative biopsies (p = 0.01), and the overall cancer detection rate and the cancer detection rate by fusion guided biopsy (each p <0.001). No difference was found in the rates of upgrading by fusion guided biopsy (p = 0.28) or upgrading to clinically significant disease (p = 0.95). A statistically significant difference remained in the overall cancer detection rate and the rate by fusion guided biopsy after matching. On subgroup analysis we found a difference in the overall cancer detection rate and the rate by fusion guided biopsy (p <0.001 and 0.003) in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy but no difference in the 2 rates (p = 0.39 and 0.51, respectively) in biopsy naïve patients.
Conclusions: Improved detection of clinically significant cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided biopsy is reproducible by an experienced multidisciplinary team consisting of dedicated radiologists and urologists.
Keywords: adenocarcinoma; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; ultrasound, high-intensity focused, transrectal.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reply by Authors.J Urol. 2016 Jun;195(6):1743. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.125. Epub 2016 Mar 19. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27001635 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2016 Jun;195(6):1742-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.124. Epub 2016 Mar 19. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27001636 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.066. Epub 2016 Feb 13. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26880408 Free PMC article.
-
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies.J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2152-2157. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.025. Epub 2012 Oct 18. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 23083875 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.J Urol. 2020 May;203(5):918-925. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000692. Epub 2019 Dec 10. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31821099
-
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1613-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.079. Epub 2016 Jun 16. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27320841 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes.Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Apr;17(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0589-z. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 26902626 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Contemporary Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Jul;18(7):52. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0699-2. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28589398 Review.
-
A urologist's perspective on prostate cancer imaging: past, present, and future.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 May;41(5):805-16. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0751-6. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016. PMID: 27138438 Free PMC article.
-
Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsy.Urol Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):32.e1-32.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 12. Urol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27743850 Free PMC article.
-
Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers.Future Oncol. 2016 Nov;12(21):2417-2430. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0178. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Future Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27400645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2):327-334. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.097. Epub 2016 Aug 28. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27582434 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Cancer Society®: Learn About Cancer: Prostate Cancer–Detailed Guide 2014. Available at http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/detailedguide/prostate-cance.... Accessed December 22, 2015.
-
- Moyer VA and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157: 120. - PubMed
-
- Cohen MS, Hanley RS, Kurteva T et al.: Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 371. - PubMed
-
- Kvale R, Moller B, Wahlqvist R et al.: Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study. BJU Int 2009; 103: 1647. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials