[The safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic surgery for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma in China: an updated and cumulative meta-analysis]
- PMID: 26812981
[The safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic surgery for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma in China: an updated and cumulative meta-analysis]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the present clinical effectiveness and its change trend by an updated and cumulative meta-analysis of endoscopic versus microscopic surgery for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma in China.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature related to theme,and the meta-analysis of the data extracted onto a standard form was conducted by State 12.0 software.
Results: Finally 14 studies were included. There were 1 888 patients in total including 962 patients receiving endoscopic surgery and 926 patients undergoing microscopic surgery. Compared with microscopic group,there were significant advantages in endoscopic group including the high rate of complete tumor resection (OR=1.951, 95% CI: 1.525-2.495) and the lower incidence of overall operation complication (OR=0.480, 95% CI: 0.298-0.773) and cerebrospinal fluid leakage (OR=0.592, 95% CI: 0.399-0.878), but the advantage of the incidence rate of diabetes insipidus (OR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.420-1.252) was no statistically significant. Cumulative meta-analysis suggested that the advantage of total resection of tumor has stabilized in 2013.
Conclusion: At present in our country, compared with microscopic group, there were significant advantages in endoscopic group including the rate of complete tumor resection and the incidence of overall operation complications and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, but the advantage of the incidence rate of diabetes insipidus was no statistically significant difference. The follow-up studies related to the rate of total resection of tumor may not change the existing meta-analysis results.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of outcomes between a less experienced surgeon using a fully endoscopic technique and a very experienced surgeon using a microscopic transsphenoidal technique for pituitary adenoma.J Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;124(3):596-604. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS15102. Epub 2015 Oct 16. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26473774
-
Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr 11;12:94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-94. World J Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24721812 Free PMC article.
-
Transition From Microscopic to Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Nonfunctional Pituitary Adenomas.World Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;84(1):48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Feb 28. World Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 25731792
-
Systematic review and network meta-analysis assess the comparative efficacy and safety of transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumor.Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Feb;44(1):515-527. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01240-3. Epub 2020 Feb 8. Neurosurg Rev. 2021. PMID: 32036504
-
Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary surgery.Neurocirugia (Astur). 2014 Jul-Aug;25(4):170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Apr 18. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2014. PMID: 24747035 Review.
Cited by
-
The posterior nasoseptal flap: A novel technique for closure after endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas.Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Feb 14;9:32. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_192_17. eCollection 2018. Surg Neurol Int. 2018. PMID: 29527390 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical study of endoscopic treatment of a sellar pituitary adenomas with sellar diaphragm defect.BMC Neurol. 2020 Apr 11;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01690-8. BMC Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32278345 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the application of diving endoscopic technique in determining the extent of pituitary adenoma resection via the trans-nasal-sphenoidal approach.Exp Ther Med. 2018 Apr;15(4):3815-3819. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.5922. Epub 2018 Mar 2. Exp Ther Med. 2018. PMID: 29581739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical