Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;4(6):594-9.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.11.01.

Test-retest reliability and discriminant validity for the Brazilian version of "The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Problem Index" and "Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Patient Symptom Scale" instruments

Affiliations

Test-retest reliability and discriminant validity for the Brazilian version of "The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Problem Index" and "Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Patient Symptom Scale" instruments

Marcella Lima Victal et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The purpose is to evaluate the psychometric properties of reliability and discriminant validity of the Brazilian Portuguese versions of two instruments used in the diagnosis of interstitial cystitis (IC): "The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Problem Index" (The O'Leary-Sant), and "Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Patient Symptom Scale".

Methods: Three groups of patients were examined: a study group (subjects with IC), control group 1 (individuals with at least one IC symptom), and control group 2 (subjects without IC symptoms). Test-retest stability was evaluated at intervals of 3 to 7 days in the study group. Discriminant validity was examined in all three groups.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [95% confidence interval (CI)] results were 0.56 (range, 0.21-0.78) for The O'Leary-Sant Symptom Index, 0.48 (range, 0.10-0.73) for The O'Leary-Sant Problem Index, and 0.49 (range, 0.12-0.74) for the PUF. To analyze discriminant validity between groups, we used Fisher's exact test and odd ratio (OR) to identify differences. We obtained a P value<0.0001, which indicated that the null hypothesis was rejected; in other words, there was evidence that at least two different groups were compared to the proportion of patients with IC.

Conclusions: The analyzed instruments did not reach appropriate values for reliability. Future studies are needed to analyze the psychometric measures of these instruments on a larger sample of patients with IC.

Keywords: Diagnosis; interstitial cystitis (IC); questionnaires; validation study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim SH, Oh SJ. Comparison of voiding questionnaires between female interstitial cystitis and female idiopathic overactive bladder. Int Neurourol J 2010;14:86-92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nickel JC. Diagnosis of interstitial cystitis: another look. Rev Urol 2000;2:167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Kidney and Urologic Diseases Information Clearinghouse. Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome. Available online: http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-topics/urologic-disea...
    1. Warren JW, Brown J, Tracy JK, et al. Evidence-based criteria for pain of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome in women. Urology 2008;71:444-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parsons CL, Dell J, Stanford EJ, et al. Increased prevalence of interstitial cystitis: previously unrecognized urologic and gynecologic cases identified using a new symptom questionnaire and intravesical potassium sensitivity. Urology 2002;60:573-8. - PubMed