[Outcomes of endovascular repairing aortic arch disease hybrid with supra-arch debranching procedures]
- PMID: 26813836
[Outcomes of endovascular repairing aortic arch disease hybrid with supra-arch debranching procedures]
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the experience of endovascular repairing aortic arch disease hybrid with supra-arch debranching procedures.
Methods: It was a retrospective study. From January 2002 to December 2014, 42 high risk patients with aortic arch disease were treated by supra-arch debranching hybrid with subsequent endovascular repair in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. There were 39 male and 3 female patients with a mean age of (53±13) years (ranging from 34 to 80 years). Of the 42 patients, 7 were thoracic aortic aneurysm, 20 were Stanford type B aortic dissection and 15 were Stanford type A aortic dissection. After the supra-aortic debranching technique, simultaneous (n=16) or staged (n=26, mean interval (7±3) days) endovascular repair were performed. Fisher exact test was used to compare the in-hospital mortality of ascending aorta based debranching and non-ascending aorta based debranching.
Results: Technical success rate was 81.0% (34/42). The overall 30-day complication rate was 31.0% (13/42), including 3 cerebral stroke (7.1%), 8 endoleak (19.0%, including 6 type I endoleak and 2 type II endoleak), 1 circulatory failure, 1 aorto-tracheal fistula. The 30-day mortality was 9.5% (4/42), 2 died of cerebral stroke, 1 died of circulatory failure, 1 died of aorto-tracheal fistula. The in-hospital mortality of ascending aorta based debranching group was obviously higher than that of the non-ascending aorta based debranching group (4/16 vs. 0, P=0.02). The median time of follow-up was 64.8 (2 to 156.9) months. CT scanning was performed at 1, 3 months after surgery and annually thereafter. The overall survival rate was 76.6%. During the follow-up period, there was 4 deaths, and 2 of them were aortic artery related (5.3%). There were 4 de novo complications during the follow-up period, 1 stroke attributed to bypass occlusion was cured by medical treatment, 2 pseudoaneurysm was successfully treated with open surgery, 1 stent-graft induced new distal entry tear was successfully treated with a tapered stent-graft, there was no new endoleak during follow up period, 3 type I endoleak disappeared spontaneously, and 1 type II endoleak disappeared after secondary intervention.
Conclusions: Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease hybrid with supra-arch debranching procedure is low invasive with favorable long-term outcomes. It is suitable for high risk patients of poor general condition with little tolerance to aortic arch replacement. The in-hospital mortality is higher in the ascending aorta based debranching group than in the non-ascending aorta based debranching group. Stroke is a critical fatal complication and should be attached attention.
Similar articles
-
[Hybrid treatment of aortic arch disease with ascending aorta to carotid artery revascularization and subsequent endovascular repair].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Feb;53(2):140-4. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 25908289 Chinese.
-
Hybrid Approach to Management of Complex Aortic Arch Pathologies: A Single-Center Experience in China.Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;31:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Dec 7. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26675146
-
Hybrid aortic arch repair for complicated type B aortic dissection.J Vasc Surg. 2013 Dec;58(6):1490-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.091. Epub 2013 Jul 21. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23880549
-
Aortic Arch Reconstruction: Are Hybrid Debranching Procedures a Good Choice?Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Nov;27(11):1335-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 30. Heart Lung Circ. 2018. PMID: 29699874 Review.
-
Supra-aortic interventions for endovascular exclusion of the entire aortic arch.J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):281-297.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.024. J Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28647036 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources