Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;13(3):151-67.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.313. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines

Sophie M Bruinsma et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

In the past decade active surveillance (AS) of men with localized prostate cancer has become an increasingly popular management option, and a range of clinical guidelines have been published on this topic. Existing guidelines regarding AS for prostate cancer vary widely, but predominantly state that the most suitable patients for AS are those with pretreatment clinical stage T1c or T2 tumours, serum PSA levels <10 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason scores of 6 or less, a maximum of one or two tumour-positive biopsy core samples and/or a maximum of 50% of cancer per core sample. Following initiation of an AS programme, most guidelines recommend serial serum PSA measurements, digital rectal examinations and surveillance biopsies to check for and identify pathological indications of tumour progression. Definitions of disease reclassification and progression differ among guidelines and multiple criteria for initiation of definitive treatment are proposed. The variety of descriptions of criteria for clinically insignificant prostate cancer indicates a lack of consensus on optimal AS and intervention thresholds. A single set of guidelines are needed in order to reduce variations in clinical practice and to optimize clinical decision-making. To enable truly evidence-based guidelines, further research that combines existing evidence, while also gathering information from more long-term studies is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Curr Opin Urol. 2014 May;24(3):256-63 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Feb;8(2):162-200 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1117-23 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):637-45 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances