Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;111(11):1900-1907.
doi: 10.1111/add.13286. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Ambivalence: Prerequisite for success in motivational interviewing with adolescents?

Affiliations
Review

Ambivalence: Prerequisite for success in motivational interviewing with adolescents?

Sarah W Feldstein Ewing et al. Addiction. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background and aims: The exploration and resolution of ambivalence play an essential role in motivational interviewing (MI) theory. However, most adolescent MI studies have not examined ambivalence as a contributor to behaviour change. This paper reviewed research findings on the role of ambivalence in the adolescent change process.

Methods and results: We undertook a narrative review of the published empirical and theoretical literature on ambivalence and mechanisms of change in MI for adolescents and found that current MI evaluations appear not to have access to reliable and valid measures of ambivalence in adolescence or neuroimaging methods to evaluate the mechanisms of treatment response.

Conclusions: Improved instrumentation is needed to assess adolescents' ambivalence in clinical and research settings. Innovative methodology, including neuroimaging, may help identify factors mediating relationships between adolescents' ambivalence and treatment response.

Keywords: Adolescents; ambivalence; brain; developmental; innovative approaches; measurement; motivational interviewing; neuroimaging; substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interests None.

Comment in

References

    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
    1. Apodaca TR, Longabaugh R. Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: A review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence. Addiction. 2009;104:705–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magill M, Gaume J, Apodaca TR, Walthers J, Mastroleo NR, Borsari B, et al. The technical hypothesis of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of MI’s key causal model. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82:973–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anton RF, O’Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, Cisler RA, Couper D, Donovan DM, et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence, the COMBINE Study: A randomized control trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2003–17. - PubMed
    1. Project Match Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH Posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol. 1997;58:7–29. - PubMed

Publication types