Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study
- PMID: 26815368
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4212-y
Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate consistency in shear wave velocities (SWVs) on ultrasound elastography using different machines, transducers and acquisition depths.
Methods: The SWVs were measured using an elasticity phantom with a Young's modulus of 16.9 kPa, with three recently introduced ultrasound elastography machines (A, B and C from different vendors) and two transducers (low and high frequencies) at four depths (2, 3, 4 and 5 cm). Mean SWVs from 15 measurements and coefficient of variations (CVs) were compared between three machines, two transducers and four acquisition depths.
Results: The SWVs using the high frequency transducer were not acquired at 5 cm depth in machine B, and a high frequency transducer was not available in machine C. The mean SWVs in the three machines were different (p ≤ 0.002). The CVs were 0-0.09 in three machines. The mean SWVs between the two transducers were different (p < 0.001) except at 4 and 5 cm depths in machine A. The SWVs were affected by the acquisition depths in all conditions (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: There is considerable difference in SWVs on ultrasound elastography depending on different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Caution is needed when using the cutoff values of SWVs in different conditions.
Key points: • The shear wave velocities (SWVs) are different between different ultrasound elastography machines • The SWVs are also different between different transducers and acquisition depths • Caution is needed when using the cutoff SWVs measured under different conditions.
Keywords: Comparison; Consistency; Elastography; Phantom; Ultrasound.
Similar articles
-
Performance evaluation of commercial and non-commercial shear wave elastography implementations for vascular applications.Ultrasonics. 2024 May;140:107312. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107312. Epub 2024 Apr 6. Ultrasonics. 2024. PMID: 38599075
-
Motion effects on the measurement of stiffness on ultrasound shear wave elastography: a moving liver fibrosis phantom study.Med Ultrason. 2018 Feb 4;1(1):14-20. doi: 10.11152/mu-1138. Med Ultrason. 2018. PMID: 29400362
-
Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study.BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 5;7(1):e013925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013925. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28057657 Free PMC article.
-
Variability of shear wave velocity using different frequencies in acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography: a phantom and normal liver study.Ultraschall Med. 2013 Jun;34(3):260-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313008. Epub 2012 Sep 21. Ultraschall Med. 2013. PMID: 23023455
-
Superficial ultrasound shear wave speed measurements in soft and hard elasticity phantoms: repeatability and reproducibility using two ultrasound systems.Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Mar;45(3):376-85. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3150-6. Epub 2014 Sep 24. Pediatr Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25249389 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
What we need to know when performing and interpreting US elastography.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;22(3):406-414. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2016.0106. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27729637 Free PMC article.
-
Hybrid high-definition microvessel imaging/shear wave elastography improves breast lesion characterization.Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Mar 5;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01511-5. Breast Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 35248115 Free PMC article.
-
Liver stiffness and perfusion changes for hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in rabbit model.World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 21;26(7):706-716. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i7.706. World J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32116418 Free PMC article.
-
Individualized-thresholding Shear Wave Elastography combined with clinical factors improves specificity in discriminating breast masses.Breast. 2020 Dec;54:248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Nov 4. Breast. 2020. PMID: 33188991 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective Comparison of Handheld Ultrasound Devices from Different Manufacturers with Respect to B-Scan Quality and Clinical Significance for Various Abdominal Sonography Questions.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;13(24):3622. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243622. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38132206 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources