Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;106(2):105-12.
doi: 10.5935/abc.20160015. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

Association between Functional Variables and Heart Failure after Myocardial Infarction in Rats

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Association between Functional Variables and Heart Failure after Myocardial Infarction in Rats

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Bertha F Polegato et al. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Feb.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Mar;106(3):267. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160034. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27027373 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Heart failure prediction after acute myocardial infarction may have important clinical implications.

Objective: To analyze the functional echocardiographic variables associated with heart failure in an infarction model in rats.

Methods: The animals were divided into two groups: control and infarction. Subsequently, the infarcted animals were divided into groups: with and without heart failure. The predictive values were assessed by logistic regression. The cutoff values predictive of heart failure were determined using ROC curves.

Results: Six months after surgery, 88 infarcted animals and 43 control animals were included in the study. Myocardial infarction increased left cavity diameters and the mass and wall thickness of the left ventricle. Additionally, myocardial infarction resulted in systolic and diastolic dysfunction, characterized by lower area variation fraction values, posterior wall shortening velocity, E-wave deceleration time, associated with higher values of E / A ratio and isovolumic relaxation time adjusted by heart rate. Among the infarcted animals, 54 (61%) developed heart failure. Rats with heart failure have higher left cavity mass index and diameter, associated with worsening of functional variables. The area variation fraction, the E/A ratio, E-wave deceleration time and isovolumic relaxation time adjusted by heart rate were functional variables predictors of heart failure. The cutoff values of functional variables associated with heart failure were: area variation fraction < 31.18%; E / A > 3.077; E-wave deceleration time < 42.11 and isovolumic relaxation time adjusted by heart rate < 69.08.

Conclusion: In rats followed for 6 months after myocardial infarction, the area variation fraction, E/A ratio, E-wave deceleration time and isovolumic relaxation time adjusted by heart rate are predictors of heart failure onset.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cutoff value for the area variation fraction, as a heart failure predictor 6 months after infarction. Area under the curve: 0.6277; 95% confidence interval: 0.5066 to 0.7489; p-value: 0.044; cutoff < 31.18; sensitivity: 55.60%; specificity: 57.34%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cutoff value for the E/A ratio as a heart failure predictor 6 months after infarction. Area under the curve: 0.6985; 95% confidence interval: 0.5875 to 0.8095, p-value: 0.0017; cutoff > 3,077; sensitivity: 57.93%o; specificity: 62.56%o.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cutoff value for the deceleration time of the E wave, as a heart failure predictor 6 months after infarction. Area under the curve: 0.6533; 95% confidence interval: 0.5341 to 0.7724; p-value: 0.0218; cutoff < 42.11; sensitivity: 59.77%; specificity: 51.85%.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cutoff value for the isovolumic relaxation time adjusted by heart rate as a heart failure predictor 6 months after infarction. Area under the curve: 0.6544; 95% confidence interval: 0.5398 to 0.7691; p-value: 0.01512; cutoff < 69.08; sensitivity: 55.10%; specificity: 60.49%.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liu L, Eisen HJ. Epidemiology of heart failure and scope of the problem. Cardiol Clin. 2014;32(1):1–8. - PubMed
    1. Pimentel M, Zimerman LI, Rohde LE. Stratification of the risk of sudden death in nonischemic heart failure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(4):348–357. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minicucci MF, Azevedo PS, Polegato BF, Paiva SA, Zornoff LA. Heart failure after myocardial infarction: clinical implications and treatment. Clin Cardiol. 2011;34(7):410–414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zornoff LA, Paiva SA, Minicucci MF, Spadaro J. Experimental myocardium infarction in rats: analysis of the model. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009;93(4):434-40, 426-32. - PubMed
    1. Martinez PF, Okoshi K, Zornoff LA, Oliveira SA, Jr, Campos DH, Lima AR, et al. Echocardiographic detection of congestive heart failure in postinfarction rats. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2011;111(2):543–551. - PubMed

MeSH terms