Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;40(4):445-50.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0403-x. Epub 2014 May 1.

Pitfalls to avoid in the medical management of mass casualty incidents following terrorist bombings: the hospital perspective

Affiliations

Pitfalls to avoid in the medical management of mass casualty incidents following terrorist bombings: the hospital perspective

I Ashkenazi et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The unique patterns of injury following explosions together with the involvement of numerous physicians, most of whom are not experienced in trauma, may create problems in the medical management of mass casualty incidents.

Methods: Four hundred patient files admitted in 19 mass casualty events following bombing incidents were reviewed and possible areas which could impact survival were defined.

Results: Forty-nine (9.3 %) patients had an Injury Severity Score ≥16. Of 205 patients in whom triage decisions were available, 5 of 25 severely injured patients were undertriaged by the triage officers at the door of the hospital. Following primary evaluation inside the emergency department critical injuries in two patients were missed due to distracting, less serious injuries. Of 68 (16.1 %) patients who were operated, 28 were in need of either immediate, urgent or high-priority operations. Except for neurosurgical cases which needed to be transferred to other hospitals, there was no delay in surgery. One patient underwent negative laparotomy. There were 15 in-hospital deaths, 6 of which were deemed as either anticipated or unanticipated mortality with possibility for improvement.

Conclusion: Medical management should be evaluated following MCIs as this may illustrate possible problems which many need to be addressed in contingency planning.

Keywords: Mass casualty incidents; Terror bombings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):304-10 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):295-303 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1987 Apr;27(4):370-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1991 Oct;214(4):510-20; discussion 520-1 - PubMed
    1. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;34(2):160-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources