Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;7(6):446-53.
doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.446. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

Bonding values of two contemporary ceramic inlay materials to dentin following simulated aging

Affiliations

Bonding values of two contemporary ceramic inlay materials to dentin following simulated aging

Ashraf Abdelfattah Khalil et al. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the push-out bond strength of feldspar and zirconia-based ceramic inlays bonded to dentin with different resin cements following simulated aging.

Materials and methods: Occlusal cavities in 80 extracted molars were restored in 2 groups (n=40) with CAD/CAM feldspar (Vitablocs Trilux forte) (FP) and zirconia-based (Ceramill Zi) (ZR) ceramic inlays. The fabricated inlays were luted in 2 subgroups (n=20) with either etch-and-bond (RelyX Ultimate Clicker) (EB) or self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem Aplicap) (SA) resin cement. Ten inlays in each subgroup were subjected to 3,500 thermal cycles and 24,000 loading cycles, while the other 10 served as control. Horizontal 3 mm thick specimens were cut out of the restored teeth for push out bond strength testing. Bond strength data were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's comparisons at α=.05. The mode of ceramic-cement-dentin bond failure for each specimen was also assessed.

Results: No statistically significant differences were noticed between FP and ZR bond strength to dentin in all subgroups (ANOVA, P=.05113). No differences were noticed between EB and SA (Tukey's, P>.05) bonded to either type of ceramics. Both adhesive and mixed modes of bond failure were dominant for non-aged inlays. Simulated aging had no significant effect on bond strength values (Tukey's, P>.05) of all ceramic-cement combinations although the adhesive mode of bond failure became more common (60-80%) in aged inlays.

Conclusion: The suggested cement-ceramic combinations offer comparable bonding performance to dentin substrate either before or after simulated aging that seems to have no adverse effect on the achieved bond.

Keywords: Bonding; Ceramics; Dentin; Inlays; Resin cement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Preparation of occlusal cavities (The dotted line indicates the standardized leveling of cavity depth).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Calculation of the bonded surface area.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Testing push-out bond strength (A) Stressing test specimens on compression, (B) Flat-ended indenter and (C) test specimen.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Recorded modes of bond failure. (A) Mixed failure (white arrow indicates dentin substrate and the black arrow indicates cement material), (B) Adhesive bond failure at dentin-cement interface (white arrow indicates dentin substrate), (C) Adhesive failure at ceramic-cement interface (black arrow indicates cement material).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:619–626. - PubMed
    1. Hopp CD, Land MF. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013;5:21–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawai K, Hayashi M, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126:1414–1419. - PubMed
    1. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent. 1993;21:39–46. - PubMed
    1. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1994;22:147–153. - PubMed