Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan 20:3:15067.
doi: 10.1038/hortres.2015.67. eCollection 2016.

Sugars in peach fruit: a breeding perspective

Affiliations
Review

Sugars in peach fruit: a breeding perspective

Marco Cirilli et al. Hortic Res. .

Abstract

The last decade has been characterized by a decrease in peach (Prunus persica) fruit consumption in many countries, foremost due to unsatisfactory quality. The sugar content is one of the most important quality traits perceived by consumers, and the development of novel peach cultivars with sugar-enhanced content is a primary objective of breeding programs to revert the market inertia. Nevertheless, the progress reachable through classical phenotypic selection is limited by the narrow genetic bases of peach breeding material and by the complex quantitative nature of the trait, which is deeply affected by environmental conditions and agronomical management. The development of molecular markers applicable in MAS or MAB has become an essential strategy to boost the selection efficiency. Despite the enormous advances in 'omics' sciences, providing powerful tools for plant genotyping, the identification of the genetic bases of sugar-related traits is hindered by the lack of adequate phenotyping methods that are able to address strong within-plant variability. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge of the metabolic pathways and physiological mechanisms regulating sugar accumulation in peach fruit, the main advances in phenotyping approaches and genetic background, and finally addressing new research priorities and prospective for breeders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical map of the position on linkage groups of the main sugar-related QTLs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cantín CM, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA. Phenotypic diversity and relationship of fruit quality traits in peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. Euphytica 2010; 171: 211–226.
    1. Crisosto CH, Costa G. Preharvest factors affecting peach quality. In: Layne D R, Bassi D, editors. The Peach: Botany Production and Uses. Cambridge: CAB International; 2008. pp536–549.
    1. Iglesias I, Echeverría G. Differential effect of cultivar and harvest date on nectarine color, quality and consumer acceptance. Sci Hortic 2009; 120: 41–50.
    1. Byrne DH. Trends in stone fruit cultivar development. Hort Technol 2005; 15: 494–500.
    1. Crisosto CH. How do we increase peach consumption? Acta Hort 2002; 592: 601–605.