Overall satisfaction, sexual function, and the durability of neophallus dimensions following staged female to male genital gender confirming surgery: the Institute of Urology, London U.K. experience
- PMID: 26816764
- PMCID: PMC4708164
- DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.04.10
Overall satisfaction, sexual function, and the durability of neophallus dimensions following staged female to male genital gender confirming surgery: the Institute of Urology, London U.K. experience
Abstract
Background and purpose: What factors influence transgender men's decisions to undergo (and to not undergo) specific genital gender confirming surgeries (GCS) has not been described in the literature. Sexual function outcomes related to clitoral transposition and penile prosthesis placement is also not well described. Durability of neophallus dimensions after phalloplasty has not been described. A better understanding of these factors is necessary for pre-op counseling. We sought to assess patient genital-GCS related satisfaction, regret, pre/post-op sexual function, genital preferences, and genital measurements post-op.
Materials and methods: We evaluated ten female to male transgender patients who had previously undergone suprapubic pedicle-flap phalloplasty [suprapubic phalloplasty (SP); N=10] and 15 who had undergone radial artery forearm-flap phalloplasty [(RAP); N=15; 5/15 without and 10/15 with cutaneous nerve to clitoral nerve anastomosis] at our center (UK). We queried patients' surgery related preferences and concerns, satisfaction, and sexual function pre/post-surgery, and accounted for whether patients had undergone clitoral transposition and/or cutaneous-to-clitoral nerve anastomosis. We measured flaccid and (where applicable) erect length and girth using a smart-phone app we designed.
Results: Mean age at surgery and follow-up for those that underwent SP was 35.1 and 2.23 years, and 34 and 6.8 for those that underwent RAP. Mean satisfaction scores were 9.1/10 and 9/10 for those that underwent SP and RAP, respectively. No patient (0%) regretted starting genital-GCS surgery. All (100%) patients that could achieve orgasm before GCS with clitoral transposition could achieve orgasm after surgery, and the vast majority reported preserved quality of erogenous sensation by our transposition technique. All (100%) RAP and 9/10 SP patients reported masturbation with their phallus. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement was not associated with decreased erogenous sensation/orgasm. Penile dimensions were relatively stable through follow-up for both groups. Our App length measurements correlated with a ruler within ±<4.5%.
Conclusions: Female-to-male genital-GCS offered in 3-stages was associated with high overall satisfaction and no regret among our sample. Sexual function appears to be preserved after both clitoral transposition and inflatable prosthesis placement, and consolidation of erogenous sensation to the phallus was described as important to all subjects. Discussion of patient's pre-op sexual function, as well as specific concerns and preferences related to specific genital-GCS surgeries is important.
Keywords: Transgender; clitoral nerve anastomosis; genital gender confirming surgery (GCS); penis size; phalloplasty; sexual function.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Similar articles
-
Surgical Outcomes Following Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Multi-Center, International Survey of 129 Transmasculine Patients.J Sex Med. 2021 Apr;18(4):800-811. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.01.183. Epub 2021 Mar 1. J Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 33663938
-
Sexual Function and Quality of Life Before and After Penile Prosthesis Implantation Following Radial Forearm Flap Phalloplasty.Urology. 2017 Jun;104:204-208. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Feb 2. Urology. 2017. PMID: 28163083
-
How Big is Too Big? The Girth of Bestselling Insertive Sex Toys to Guide Maximal Neophallus Dimensions.J Sex Med. 2017 Nov;14(11):1455-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.09.012. J Sex Med. 2017. PMID: 29110808
-
The Rise of the Neophallus: A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthetic Outcomes and Complications in Gender-Affirming Surgery.J Sex Med. 2019 May;16(5):661-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 5. J Sex Med. 2019. PMID: 30956105
-
Penile and testicular prosthesis following gender-affirming phalloplasty and scrotoplasty: a narrative review and technical insights.Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Oct 31;12(10):1568-1580. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-122. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Transl Androl Urol. 2023. PMID: 37969769 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes.Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Sep 14;15:17562872231199584. doi: 10.1177/17562872231199584. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2023. PMID: 37719136 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Regret after Gender-affirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 19;9(3):e3477. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003477. eCollection 2021 Mar. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021. PMID: 33968550 Free PMC article.
-
The gender affirmative lifespan approach (GALA): A framework for competent clinical care with nonbinary clients.Int J Transgend. 2019 Jan 16;20(2-3):275-288. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2018.1485069. eCollection 2019. Int J Transgend. 2019. PMID: 32999613 Free PMC article.
-
Supporting Gender-Related Medical Decision Making for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals: A Scoping Review.Transgend Health. 2023 Mar 31;8(2):113-123. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2021.0030. eCollection 2023 Apr. Transgend Health. 2023. PMID: 37013094 Free PMC article.
-
Suprapubic phalloplasty in transmen: surgical results and critical review.Int J Impot Res. 2020 Nov;33(7):754-761. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00426-7. Epub 2021 Mar 16. Int J Impot Res. 2020. PMID: 33727691 Review.
References
-
- Byne W, Bradley SJ, Coleman E, et al. Report of the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on Treatment of Gender Identity Disorder. Arch Sex Behav 2012;41:759-96. - PubMed
-
- Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Elaut E, et al. Quality of life and sexual health after sex reassignment surgery in transsexual men. J Sex Med 2011;8:3379-88. - PubMed
-
- Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Selvaggi G, et al. Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique? Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:510-8. - PubMed
-
- Departments of Plastic Surgery, Urology, Gynecology, and Psychiatry and Gender Issues; Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
-
- Garaffa G, Christopher NA, Ralph DJ. Total phallic reconstruction in female-to-male transsexuals. Eur Urol 2010;57:715-22. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous