Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;9(12):JC08-11.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14004.6968. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

The Knowledge of Radiation and the Attitude Towards Radio-Protection among Urology Residents in India

Affiliations

The Knowledge of Radiation and the Attitude Towards Radio-Protection among Urology Residents in India

Tarun Jindal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Exposure to radiation is a hazard and precautions are necessary to limit it. This study was done to assess the knowledge of radiation and the attitude towards radio-protection among urology residents in India.

Materials and methods: A questionnaire was administered to assess the knowledge and attitude of urology residents who came from all over the country to attend a clinical meeting at Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India.

Results: All the respondents agreed to being exposed to radiation, with 78.2% using radiation in more than five cases a week. Only 65.2% always took some steps for radio-protection. Lead aprons and thyroid shields were the most common radiation protection devices used. None of the residents ever used lead gloves or protective eye glasses or dosimeters. An 82.6% felt that they did not have adequate knowledge, 85.4% of residents did not receive any formal classes regarding the risk of radiation, 21.7% either rarely or never moved out of the operating room when the radiation was being used, 42.4% did not know that the SI unit of the equivalent absorbed dose of radiation & 52.1% did not know about the amount of radiation delivered to an adult during a contrast enhanced CT scan of the abdomen.

Conclusion: Results of the present study reveal that the urology residents of India lack knowledge about the risks of radiation exposure. Majority of them did not take necessary precautions to limit their exposure to radiation.

Keywords: Imaging; Ionizing radiation; X ray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Graph demonstrating the number of procedures performed per week by respondents which expose them to radiation
[Table/Fig-2]:
[Table/Fig-2]:
Graph demonstrating the results for question number two, eight and eleven of the questionnaire

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen SA, Rangarajan SS, Chen T, Palazzi KL, Langford JS, Sur RL. Occupational hazard: radiation exposure for the urologist–developing a reference standard. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39:209–13. - PubMed
    1. Ritter M, Krombach P, Martinschek A, Siegel FP, Schmitt M, Weiss C, et al. Radiation exposure during endourologic procedures using over-the-table fluoroscopy sources. J Endourol. 2012;26:47–51. - PubMed
    1. Söylemez H, Altunoluk B, Bozkurt Y, Sancaktutar AA, Penbegül N, Atar M. Radiation exposure–do urologists take it seriously in Turkey? J Urol. 2012;187:1301–05. - PubMed
    1. Söylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, Silay MS, Penbegül N, Bozkurt Y, Atar M, et al. Knowledge and attitude of European urology residents about ionizing radiation. Urology. 2013;81:30–35. - PubMed
    1. Jindal T. The risk of radiation exposure to assisting staff in urological procedures: a literature review. Urol Nurs. 2013;33:136–9. 147. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources