Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 26819186
- DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5233
Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) is a new minimally invasive treatment based on the complete removal of the sinus cavity with a minimal surgical wound.
Objective: To validate the safety and efficacy of VAAPS.
Design, setting, and participants: From January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013, we enrolled 145 consecutive patients from an intention-to-treat population at a single academic center in Italy. The last date of follow-up for this analysis was December 31, 2014. Patients with chronic nonrecurrent pilonidal sinus were randomized to minimally invasive (76 patients) or conventional (69 patients) treatment of pilonidal sinus.
Interventions: VAAPS and Bascom cleft lift procedure.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point of the study was time off work. Secondary end points were the rates of operative success and perioperative complications (infection and recurrence), operative time, patient satisfaction, and intraoperative and postoperative pain ratings.
Results: Of the 145 patients, 60 (78.9%) were male and 16 (21.1%) were female in the minimally invasive treatment group, and 54 (78.3%) were male and 15 (21.7%) were female in the conventional treatment group. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 25.5 (5.9) years in the minimally invasive treatment group and 25.7 (5.3) in the conventional treatment group. In the minimally invasive treatment group, mean (SD) time off work was significantly less compared with the conventional treatment group (1.6 [1.7] vs 8.2 [3.9] days; P < .001). Mean (SD) operative time was significantly longer in the minimally invasive treatment group (42.9 [9.8] minutes) vs the conventional treatment group (26.5 [8.7] minutes), P < .001. Although the overall complication rate was similar in both groups, there were fewer infections (1 [1.3%] vs 5 [7.2%]; P = .10) recorded in the minimally invasive treatment group. Similarly, patients enrolled in the minimally invasive treatment group expressed significantly less pain and higher satisfaction.
Conclusions and relevance: In the new era of minimally invasive treatment surgery, pilonidal sinus could become a disease treated with an endoscopic approach. Although additional studies are needed to provide a definitive conclusion, our results encourage considering the adoption of this treatment as the most effective way to treat pilonidal sinus.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01963273.
Similar articles
-
Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) versus sinusectomy for treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative study.Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):179-183. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-00611-2. Epub 2018 Dec 12. Updates Surg. 2019. PMID: 30542957
-
Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus: a new minimally invasive treatment--a pilot study.Surgery. 2014 Mar;155(3):562-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Oct 25. Surgery. 2014. PMID: 24300343 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic versus conventional treatment of pilonidal sinus.Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Jan 9. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31926328 Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally invasive techniques in the management of pilonidal disease.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Apr;34(4):561-568. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03260-y. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019. PMID: 30810799 Review.
-
Pilonidal sinus disease: Review of current practice and prospects for endoscopic treatment.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Aug 1;57:212-217. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.050. eCollection 2020 Sep. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32793341 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Early versus delayed endoscopic treatment of acute pilonidal abscess: a propensity score-matched analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Feb;36(2):339-345. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03767-9. Epub 2020 Oct 3. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33011845
-
Oxygen-enriched oleic matrix (NovoX) for wound healing in pediatric patients undergoing open surgical treatment for pilonidal disease: Preliminary experience.Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 25;10:1068280. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1068280. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36507121 Free PMC article.
-
Inverse 'D' incision technique in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; excision with minimal tissue loss, closure without tension and lateral location of the suture line.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Nov;97(5):261-265. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.5.261. Epub 2019 Nov 1. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019. PMID: 31742211 Free PMC article.
-
Five-year recurrence after endoscopic approach to pilonidal sinus disease: A multicentre experience.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):929-935. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02846-7. Epub 2023 Aug 19. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 37597082
-
Platelet-rich plasma for pilonidal disease: a systematic review.J Int Med Res. 2023 Dec;51(12):3000605231216590. doi: 10.1177/03000605231216590. J Int Med Res. 2023. PMID: 38141657 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical