Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;31(1):17-20.
doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0044.

Connecting mercury science to policy: from sources to seafood

Connecting mercury science to policy: from sources to seafood

Celia Y Chen et al. Rev Environ Health. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) is a global contaminant whose presence in the biosphere has been increased by human activity, particularly coal burning/energy production, mining, especially artisanal scale gold mining, and other industrial activities. Mercury input to the surface ocean has doubled over the past century leading governments and organizations to take actions to protect humans from the harmful effects of this toxic element. Recently, the UN Environmental Program led 128 countries to negotiate and sign a legally binding agreement, the 2013 Minimata Convention, to control Hg emissions and releases to land and water globally. In an effort to communicate science to this emerging international policy, the Dartmouth Superfund Research Program formed the Coastal and Marine Mercury Ecosystem Research Collaborative (C-MERC) in 2010 that brought together more than 70 scientists and policy experts to analyze and synthesize the science on Hg pollution in the marine environment from Hg sources to MeHg in seafood. The synthesis of the science revealed that the sources and inputs of Hg and their pathways to human exposure are largely determined by ecosystem spatial scales and that these spatial scales determine the organizational level of policies. The paper summarizes the four major findings of the report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scales of mercury inputs to marine ecosystems from estuaries to the open ocean. Reproduced from Sources to Seafood: Mercury Pollution in the Marine Environment, p. 10.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scales of mercury policies from the local to the global. Reproduced from Sources to Seafood: Mercury Pollution in the Marine Environment, p. 19.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Driscoll CT, Han YJ, Chen CY, Evers DC, Lambert KF, Holsen TM, Kamman NC, Munson RK. Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the Northeastern United States. Bioscience. 2007;57:17–28.
    1. Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF, Morel FMM. The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury - anthropogenic influences. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta. 1994;58:3191–3198.
    1. Selin NE, Jacob DJ, Yantosca RM, Strode S, Jaegle L, Sunderland EM. Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury: Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2008;22
    1. ATSDR. Priority list of hazardous substances. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; 2011.
    1. Karagas MR, Choi AL, Oken E, Horvat M, Schoeny R, Kamai E, Cowell W, Grandjean P, Korrick S. Evidence on the human health effects of low level methylmercury exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2012 doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104494. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types