Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft
- PMID: 26820966
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4005-5
Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the knee kinematics of the intact, MPFL-ruptured and MPFL-reconstructed knee and, moreover, to compare dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure of the gracilis tendon and the fascia lata as an alternative graft option for reconstruction of the MPFL.
Methods: Eight paired human cadaveric knees were fixed in a custom-made fixation device. Patellofemoral contact pressure was assessed during a dynamic flexion movement at 15°-30°-45°-60°-75° and 90° using a pressure-sensitive film (Tekscan). The medial patellofemoral ligament was cut, and measurements were repeated. Finally, reconstruction of the MPFL was performed using the gracilis tendon (group I) or a fascia lata graft (group II). Tunnel localization was performed under fluoroscopic control. Grafts were fixed at 30° of flexion, and pressure measurements were repeated.
Results: Incision of the medial patellofemoral ligament significantly reduced patellofemoral contact pressure at 15°, 30° and 45° of knee flexion compared to the intact knee (p < 0.05), whereas reconstruction of the MPFL using either gracilis tendon of the fascia lata was able to restore pressure distributions at 15° and 30° of knee flexion. However, in the hamstring group, reconstruction of the MPFL revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure at 45° of flexion (p = 0.038) compared to the intact knee. In the fascia lata group, a significant reduction in patellofemoral contact pressure was observed after MPFL reconstruction at 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL with either a gracilis or a fascia lata graft showed comparable patellofemoral pressure distributions which were closely restored compared to the native knee. Therefore, the fascia lata has shown to be a viable alternative to the gracilis tendon for reconstruction of the MPFL. However, anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL may lead to persistently altered patellofemoral contact pressure during knee flexion compared to the native knee independent of the tested graft.
Keywords: Biomechanical; Knee kinematics; MPFL; Patella; Patellofemoral.
Similar articles
-
Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1144-1153. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05789-5. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31740983
-
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Impact of Knee Flexion Angle During Graft Fixation on Dynamic Patellofemoral Contact Pressure-A Biomechanical Study.Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1072-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.047. Epub 2018 Jan 2. Arthroscopy. 2018. PMID: 29305291
-
The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tension on patellar contact mechanics and kinematics after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):364-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546513509230. Epub 2013 Nov 25. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24275861
-
Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Jul;30(5):763-770. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02636-z. Epub 2020 Feb 1. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020. PMID: 32008097 Free PMC article.
-
Is fascia lata a viable graft for MPFL reconstruction? An overview of surgical technique and scoping literature review.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Nov 14;86(12):7299-7304. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002731. eCollection 2024 Dec. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39649880 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Length change patterns and shape of a grafted tendon after anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction differs from that in a healthy knee.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1245-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4620-9. Epub 2017 Jul 24. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 28741155
-
Ligament reconstruction combined with osteotomy: Case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 1;104(31):e43419. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043419. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 40760638 Free PMC article.
-
Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1144-1153. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05789-5. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31740983
-
Autograft vs Allograft Comparison in Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.Ochsner J. 2019 Summer;19(2):96-101. doi: 10.31486/toj.18.0081. Ochsner J. 2019. PMID: 31258420 Free PMC article.
-
Repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament with suture tape augmentation leads to similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics like reconstruction with a tendon graft: a biomechanical comparison.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Feb;28(2):478-488. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05668-z. Epub 2019 Aug 13. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31410528
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources