Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 28;18(1):e18.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.4596.

The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review

Yi-Ru Regina Chen  1 , Peter J Schulz
Affiliations

The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review

Yi-Ru Regina Chen et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The aging of the population is an inexorable change that challenges governments and societies in every developed country. Based on clinical and empirical data, social isolation is found to be prevalent among elderly people, and it has negative consequences on the elderly's psychological and physical health. Targeting social isolation has become a focus area for policy and practice. Evidence indicates that contemporary information and communication technologies (ICT) have the potential to prevent or reduce the social isolation of elderly people via various mechanisms.

Objective: This systematic review explored the effects of ICT interventions on reducing social isolation of the elderly.

Methods: Relevant electronic databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO, SSCI, Communication Studies: a SAGE Full-Text Collection, Communication & Mass Media Complete, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore) were systematically searched using a unified strategy to identify quantitative and qualitative studies on the effectiveness of ICT-mediated social isolation interventions for elderly people published in English between 2002 and 2015. Narrative synthesis was performed to interpret the results of the identified studies, and their quality was also appraised.

Results: Twenty-five publications were included in the review. Four of them were evaluated as rigorous research. Most studies measured the effectiveness of ICT by measuring specific dimensions rather than social isolation in general. ICT use was consistently found to affect social support, social connectedness, and social isolation in general positively. The results for loneliness were inconclusive. Even though most were positive, some studies found a nonsignificant or negative impact. More importantly, the positive effect of ICT use on social connectedness and social support seemed to be short-term and did not last for more than six months after the intervention. The results for self-esteem and control over one's life were consistent but generally nonsignificant. ICT was found to alleviate the elderly's social isolation through four mechanisms: connecting to the outside world, gaining social support, engaging in activities of interests, and boosting self-confidence.

Conclusions: More well-designed studies that contain a minimum risk of research bias are needed to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of ICT interventions for elderly people in reducing their perceived social isolation as a multidimensional concept. The results of this review suggest that ICT could be an effective tool to tackle social isolation among the elderly. However, it is not suitable for every senior alike. Future research should identify who among elderly people can most benefit from ICT use in reducing social isolation. Research on other types of ICT (eg, mobile phone-based instant messaging apps) should be conducted to promote understanding and practice of ICT-based social-isolation interventions for elderly people.

Keywords: ICT intervention; elderly; social isolation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of the inclusion process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Population Ageing 2007. New York: United Nations; 2007. [2015-11-13]. Magnitude and speed of population ageing http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing... .
    1. Victor C, Bowling A, Bond J, Scambler S. Loneliness, social isolation and living alone in later life. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield: Economic and Social Research Council Growing Older Programme; 2003.
    1. Iliffe S, Kharicha K, Harari D, Swift C, Gillmann G, Stuck AE. Health risk appraisal in older people 2: the implications for clinicians and commissioners of social isolation risk in older people. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Apr;57(537):277–82. http://bjgp.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17394730 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tomaszewski W, Barnes M. Banks J, Breeze E, Lessof C, Nazroo J. editors. Living in the 21st century: older people in England. The 2006 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (wave 3) London: Institute of Fiscal Studies; 2008. Investigating the dynamics of social detachment in old age; pp. 150–185.
    1. Hawthorne G. Measuring Social Isolation in Older Adults: Development and Initial Validation of the Friendship Scale. Soc Indic Res. 2006 Feb 13;77(3):521–548. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources