The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis
- PMID: 26823232
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.13439
The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate whether the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2005 revision of the Gleason grading system has influenced the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP), as the new guideline implies that some prostate cancers previously graded as Gleason score 6 (3 + 3) are now considered as 7 (3 + 4).
Patients and methods: A matched-pair analysis was conducted. In all, 215 patients with Gleason score 6 or 7 (3 + 4) prostate cancer on biopsy who underwent RP before 31 December 2005 (pre-ISUP group), were matched 1:1 by biopsy Gleason score, clinical tumour category, PSA level, and margin status to patients undergoing RP between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2011 (post-ISUP group). Patients were followed until BCR defined as a PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/mL. Risk of BCR was analysed in a competing-risk model.
Results: The median follow-up was 9.5 years in the pre-ISUP group and 4.8 years in the post-ISUP group. The 5-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 34.0% and 13.9% in the pre-ISUP and post-ISUP groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The difference in cumulative incidence applied to both patients with Gleason score 6 (P < 0.001) and 7 (3 + 4) (P = 0.004). There was no difference in the 5-year cumulative incidence of BCR between patients with pre-ISUP Gleason score 6 and post-ISUP Gleason score 7 (3 + 4) (P = 0.34). In a multiple Cox-proportional hazard regression model, ISUP 2005 grading was a strong prognostic factor for BCR within 5 years of RP (hazard ratio 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.54; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The revision of the Gleason grading system has reduced the risk of BCR after RP in patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 (3 + 4). This may have consequences when comparing outcomes across studies and historical periods and may affect future treatment recommendations.
Keywords: Gleason score; ISUP 2005; biochemical recurrence; biopsy; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Current Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7: has it lost its significance compared with its historical counterpart?BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):853-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.13442. BJU Int. 2016. PMID: 27173996 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):651-658. doi: 10.1111/bju.13857. Epub 2017 Apr 30. BJU Int. 2017. PMID: 28371244
-
The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):515-9. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315. Pathology. 2015. PMID: 26325670
-
Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.BJU Int. 2017 Jan;119(1):50-56. doi: 10.1111/bju.13458. Epub 2016 Mar 24. BJU Int. 2017. PMID: 26918298
-
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017. PMID: 28177964
-
Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.Pathology. 2019 Aug;51(5):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Pathology. 2019. PMID: 31279442 Review.
Cited by
-
Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):541-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.141. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27530265 Review.
-
miR-145-5p: A Potential Biomarker in Predicting Gleason Upgrading of Prostate Biopsy Samples Scored 3+3=6.Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Dec 10;13:9095-9106. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S336671. eCollection 2021. Cancer Manag Res. 2021. PMID: 34916852 Free PMC article.
-
The presence of secondary circulating prostate tumour cells determines the risk of biochemical relapse for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who are treated only with external radiotherapy.Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Jun 20;12:844. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.844. eCollection 2018. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018. PMID: 30034521 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contemporary grading of prostate cancer: 2017 update for pathologists and clinicians.Asian J Androl. 2017 Aug 4;21(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_24_17. Online ahead of print. Asian J Androl. 2017. PMID: 28782737 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic Prostate Gleason Grading Using Pyramid Semantic Parsing Network in Digital Histopathology.Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 8;12:772403. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.772403. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35463378 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous