Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;66(643):e114-27.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683509.

Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review

Bruno Rushforth  1 , Carolyn McCrorie  2 , Liz Glidewell  2 , Eleanor Midgley  2 , Robbie Foy  2
Affiliations

Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review

Bruno Rushforth et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of evidence-based guidance, many patients with type 2 diabetes do not achieve treatment goals.

Aim: To guide quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes by synthesising qualitative evidence on primary care physicians' and nurses' perceived influences on care.

Design and setting: Systematic review of qualitative studies with findings organised using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Method: Databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ASSIA from 1980 until March 2014. Studies included were English-language qualitative studies in primary care of physicians' or nurses' perceived influences on treatment goals for type 2 diabetes.

Results: A total of 32 studies were included: 17 address general diabetes care, 11 glycaemic control, three blood pressure, and one cholesterol control. Clinicians struggle to meet evolving treatment targets within limited time and resources, and are frustrated with resulting compromises. They lack confidence in knowledge of guidelines and skills, notably initiating insulin and facilitating patient behaviour change. Changing professional boundaries have resulted in uncertainty about where clinical responsibility resides. Accounts are often couched in emotional terms, especially frustrations over patient compliance and anxieties about treatment intensification.

Conclusion: Although resources are important, many barriers to improving care are amenable to behaviour change strategies. Improvement strategies need to account for differences between clinical targets and consider tailored rather than 'one size fits all' approaches. Training targeting knowledge is necessary but insufficient to bring about major change; approaches to improve diabetes care need to delineate roles and responsibilities, and address clinicians' skills and emotions around treatment intensification and facilitation of patient behaviour change.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, type 2; primary health care; qualitative research; quality improvement; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of studies through review. aTwo papers describe data taken from the same study.,
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization . 2008–2013 Action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: WHO; 2009.
    1. Diabetes UK . State of the nation 2013 England. London: Diabetes UK; 2013.
    1. World Health Organization Diabetes programme. http://www.who.int/diabetes/en/ (accessed 5 Nov 2015).
    1. Goldney RD, Phillips PJ, Fisher LJ, Wilson DH. Diabetes, depression, and quality of life: a population study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1066–1070. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem: recognition and management CG91. London: NICE; 2009. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg91/ (accessed 5 Nov 2015).

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources