Characterisation of the human uterine microbiome in non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1-2 region of the 16S rRNA gene
- PMID: 26823997
- PMCID: PMC4730988
- DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1602
Characterisation of the human uterine microbiome in non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1-2 region of the 16S rRNA gene
Abstract
Background. It is widely assumed that the uterine cavity in non-pregnant women is physiologically sterile, also as a premise to the long-held view that human infants develop in a sterile uterine environment, though likely reflecting under-appraisal of the extent of the human bacterial metacommunity. In an exploratory study, we aimed to investigate the putative presence of a uterine microbiome in a selected series of non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1-2 hypervariable region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. Methods. Nineteen women with various reproductive conditions, including subfertility, scheduled for hysteroscopy and not showing uterine anomalies were recruited. Subjects were highly diverse with regard to demographic and medical history and included nulliparous and parous women. Endometrial tissue and mucus harvesting was performed by use of a transcervical device designed to obtain endometrial biopsy, while avoiding cervicovaginal contamination. Bacteria were targeted by use of a barcoded Illumina MiSeq paired-end sequencing method targeting the 16S rRNA gene V1-2 region, yielding an average of 41,194 reads per sample after quality filtering. Taxonomic annotation was pursued by comparison with sequences available through the Ribosomal Database Project and the NCBI database. Results. Out of 183 unique 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences, 15 phylotypes were present in all samples. In some 90% of the women included, community architecture was fairly similar inasmuch B. xylanisolvens, B. thetaiotaomicron, B. fragilis and an undetermined Pelomonas taxon constituted over one third of the endometrial bacterial community. On the singular phylotype level, six women showed predominance of L. crispatus or L. iners in the presence of the Bacteroides core. Two endometrial communities were highly dissimilar, largely lacking the Bacteroides core, one dominated by L. crispatus and another consisting of a highly diverse community, including Prevotella spp., Atopobium vaginae, and Mobiluncus curtisii. Discussion. Our findings are, albeit not necessarily generalizable, consistent with the presence of a unique microbiota dominated by Bacteroides residing on the endometrium of the human non-pregnant uterus. The transcervical sampling approach may be influenced to an unknown extent by endocervical microbiota, which remain uncharacterised, and therefore warrants further validation. Nonetheless, consistent with our understanding of the human microbiome, the uterine microbiota are likely to have a previously unrecognized role in uterine physiology and human reproduction. Further study is therefore warranted to document community ecology and dynamics of the uterine microbiota, as well as the role of the uterine microbiome in health and disease.
Keywords: 16S ribosomal RNA; Bacterial vaginosis; Endometrium; Human microbiome; Illumina; Microbiota; Reproduction; Uterine microbiome; Uterus; Vaginal microbiome.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Hot topic: 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals the microbiome of the virgin and pregnant bovine uterus.J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4953-4960. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12592. Epub 2017 Apr 21. J Dairy Sci. 2017. PMID: 28434745 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):684-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27717732
-
How uterine microbiota might be responsible for a receptive, fertile endometrium.Hum Reprod Update. 2018 Jul 1;24(4):393-415. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy012. Hum Reprod Update. 2018. PMID: 29668899 Review.
-
Differential characteristics of vaginal versus endometrial microbiota in IVF patients.Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 16;14(1):30508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82466-9. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39681607 Free PMC article.
-
Uterine microbiome and endometrial receptivity.Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(1):49-54. Ceska Gynekol. 2019. PMID: 31213058 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Human genital tracts microbiota: dysbiosis crucial for infertility.J Endocrinol Invest. 2022 Jun;45(6):1151-1160. doi: 10.1007/s40618-022-01752-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022. PMID: 35113404 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Infective Endocarditis Secondary to Bacteroides Thetaiotaomicron in a Patient With Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumor of Uncertain Malignant Potential: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Cureus. 2022 Mar 22;14(3):e23403. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23403. eCollection 2022 Mar. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35475083 Free PMC article.
-
Endometrial microbiome: sampling, assessment, and possible impact on embryo implantation.Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12095-7. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35589752 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial Resistance and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Genes in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter Isolates from the Uterus of Healthy Mares.Pathogens. 2023 Sep 8;12(9):1145. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12091145. Pathogens. 2023. PMID: 37764953 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of Inflammation Pathways and Inflammasome by Sex Steroid Hormones in Endometriosis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 29;10:935. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00935. eCollection 2019. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020. PMID: 32063886 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ansbacher R, Boyson WA, Morris JA. Sterility of the uterine cavity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1967;99:394–396. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous