Binaural squelch and head shadow effects in children with unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids
- PMID: 26824917
- PMCID: PMC4720924
- DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-497
Binaural squelch and head shadow effects in children with unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the amount of binaural squelch effect (BSE) and head shadow effect (HSE) in children who use unilateral cochlear implants (CI) and contralateral hearing aids (HA). The study group consisted of 19 CI recipient children who consistently wore a contralateral HA. Speech sounds were used to evaluate speech perception performance in noise. Testing was performed in three listening conditions: (1) bimodal listening with noise source on HA side; (2) CI only with noise source contralaterally (HA off); (3) CI only with noise source on the CI side. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the three listening conditions and post hoc tests indicated significant differences for all pairwise comparisons (p < 0.001). The average BSE and HSE were 11.8% and 17.1% respectively. The majority of bimodal CI users showed BSE and HSE with significant speech perception improvement in the presence of noise.
Lo scopo di questo studio è stato quello di indagare il grado di effetto squelch binaurale (BSE) e di effetto ombra (HSE) nei bambini che fanno uso di impianto cocleare (CI) e protesi acustica controlaterale (HA). Sono stati arruolati 19 bambini con CI che indossavano regolarmente una HA. Per valutare la performance vocale in presenza di rumore è stato utilizzato un test di identificazione vocalica. Il test è stato eseguito in tre condizioni di ascolto: (1) ascolto bimodale con sorgente di rumore sul lato HA; (2) ascolto con CI con sorgente di rumore sul lato HA; (3) ascolto con CI con sorgente di rumore sul lato CI. I valori medi di BSE e di HSE osservati sono 11.8% e 17.1% rispettivamente. L'analisi statistica condotta ha evidenziato una differenza significativa sia nel confronto tra le tre condizioni di ascolto che per l'analisi post-hoc (p < 0.001). In conclusione, la maggioranza dei bambini con CI hanno mostrato BSE ed HSE con un miglioramento significativo nella percezione vocale in presenza di rumore.
Keywords: Bimodal benefit; Binaural squelch effect; Children; Cochlear implants; Head shadow effect.
Figures



Similar articles
-
[A long term effect on speech recognition in the patients with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 7;53(3):189-195. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.03.005. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29614551 Chinese.
-
Binaural hearing advantages for children with bimodal fitting.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;121:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.043. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30875620
-
From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):1682-90. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000632. Otol Neurotol. 2014. PMID: 25275862
-
[Bilateral cochlear implants].HNO. 2017 Jul;65(7):561-570. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0370-8. HNO. 2017. PMID: 28702821 Review. German.
-
Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282ef3d3e. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007. PMID: 17823546 Review.
Cited by
-
Poor speech recognition, sound localization and reorganization of brain activity in children with unilateral microtia-atresia.Brain Imaging Behav. 2022 Feb;16(1):78-90. doi: 10.1007/s11682-021-00478-9. Epub 2021 Jul 10. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022. PMID: 34245431 Free PMC article.
-
The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2915. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132915. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34209904 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;276(10):2673-2680. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05502-9. Epub 2019 Jun 8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 31177325
-
The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517727900. doi: 10.1177/2331216517727900. Trends Hear. 2017. PMID: 28874096 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral Cochlear Implants or Bimodal Hearing for Children with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2020 Dec;8(4):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s40136-020-00314-6. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2020. PMID: 33815965 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cherry EC. Some experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 1953;25:975–979.
-
- Byrne D. Clinical issues and options in binaural hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear. 1981;2:187–193. - PubMed
-
- Firszt JB, Reeder RM, Skinner MW. Restoring hearing symmetry with two cochlear implants or one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:749–768. - PubMed
-
- Lederberg AR, Schick B, Spencer PE. Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: successes and challenges. Dev Psychol. 2013;49:15–30. - PubMed
-
- Nicastri M, Filipo R, Ruoppolo G, et al. Inferences and metaphoric comprehension in unilaterally implanted children with adequate formal oral language performance. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:821–827. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical